The confessions of Obama’s own mouth reveal him to be a Muslim, not a Christian.
that if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved. For with the heart one believes unto righteousness, and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
Therefore I make known to you that no one speaking by the Spirit of God calls Jesus accursed, and no one can say that Jesus is Lord except by the Holy Spirit.
Note that Barack Hussein Obama has never publicly confessed with his mouth, “Jesus is Lord.”
Saying “I am a Christian” does not make you a Christian.
Saying “Jesus Christ died for my sins” does not confess He is Lord, and does not reveal whether or not you believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead.
Obama has never publicly said the words “Jesus is Lord, and I believe that God has raised Him from the dead.”
But…
Mr. Obama recalled the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer, reciting them with a first-rate accent. In a remark that seemed delightfully uncalculated (it’ll give Alabama voters heart attacks), Mr. Obama described the call to prayer as “one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset.”
The opening lines of that prayer, which Obama recited with a first-rate Arabic accent, are translated to English as:
Allah is The Greatest. (”Allahu Akbar”)
Allah is The Greatest.
Allah is The Greatest.
Allah is The Greatest.
I bear witness that there is no deity except Allah.
I bear witness that there is no deity except Allah.
I bear witness that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah.
I bear witness that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah.
Yet Obama has never said, “Jesus is Lord, and I believe God has raised Him from the dead.”
The confessions of Obama’s own mouth reveal him to be a Muslim, not a Christian.
So it should come as no surprise that in his first year of elected office, as the Member of the Illinois Senate from the 13th district, Barack Hussein Obama was the sole sponsor of SENATE RESOLUTION 90_SR0110, which concluded with the following:
RESOLVED, BY THE SENATE OF THE NINETIETH GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,
that we salute the South Shore Islamic Community Center for their great work in making their community a better place to live;
and be it further RESOLVED,
That we declare November 1, 1997 to be the South Shore Islamic Community Center Day;
and be it further RESOLVED,
That a suitable copy of this resolution be presented to South Shore Islamic Community Center.
———-
UPDATE: From “ISLAM ON CAPITOL HILL“:
The Athan will be chanted on Capitol Hill, echoing off of the Lincoln Memorial, the Washington Monument and other great edifices that surround Capitol Hill
Thousands of Muslims from all races, creeds, colors and ethnicities will gather for the sole purpose of prayer
Bonds of friendship will be formed between those in attendance, both Muslims and Non-Muslims
What do you want to bet that Obama will chant the Athan with them?
He’s done it before, “with a first-rate accent”. The Athan, also called the adhān, is the Islamic call to prayer, what the New York Times called “the Arabic call to prayer”.
By the confessions of Obama’s own mouth, he is a Muslim, not a Christian.
As I and others have said, we have no issue with anyone’s chosen religion. But we take great issue with someone lying about it in order to get elected.
A mere 8 years after 9/11/01, the man commanding our military and with access to every secret about our military and our national defense is a deceitful Islamic usurper, a man who allowed “his” book to be published in the world’s most populous Muslim country (Indonesia) with the title: “Assault Hope: From Jakarta to the White House”. An American expatriate who knows Bahasa Indonesia fluently, says the phrase “Assault Hope” highly suggests “Jihad”, so the title truly suggests “Jihad: From Jakarta to the White House”
Obama refused to take part in any public recognition of the National Day of Prayer.
Do you think he’ll take part in chanting the Athan as part of “ISLAM ON CAPITOL HILL”?
UPDATE: Notice Any Similarity?
UPDATE:
“The American President told me in confidence that he is a Muslim,” said Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit on Nile TV.
UPDATE: A few additional thoughts…
Article VI of the Constitution includes the following:
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
Muslims are eligible to hold office. Representative Keith Ellison is a Muslim. Wikipedia says that Ellison became the first Muslim to be elected to the United States Congress, but WallBuilders says
Is Keith Ellison actually the first Muslim to serve in the U. S. Congress? According to the national media, the answer is a resounding “Yes!” [5] That may well be true; however, John Randolph of Virginia, who served in Congress from 1799-1834, expressed that in his early years, he held a position “in favor of Mahomedanism” [6] and “rejoiced in all its triumphs over the cross [Christianity].” [7] Randolph was not a Muslim in the same sense as Ellison, but he certainly cultivated what he described as a position of “natural repugnance to Christianity.” [8] Francis Scott Key, author of the “Star Spangled Banner,” [9] befriended Randolph and faithfully shared Christ with him. Randolph eventually converted to Christianity [10] and became a strong personal advocate for his newfound faith.
Openly admitting to being a Muslim would not have had any impact at all on Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of President and Commander in Chief. (There are other issues related to Obama’s eligibility, but this is not one of them). But it would have had a very significant impact on Obama’s electability.
While one does not have to be a Christian to run for office, voters in this country have a long history of following the advice of our first Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court who said:
Providence [God] has given to our people the choice of their rulers, and it is the duty, as well as the privilege and interest, of a Christian nation to select and prefer Christians for their rulers.
Barack Hussein Obama took Shahada and claimed “I am a Christian”. How can he do that? The answer is:
Taqiyya
Muslims may conceal their faith when under threat, persecution or compulsion. For Barack Hussein Obama to be electable, he felt compelled to say, “I am a Christian”. A mere 7 years after the 9/11 Jihadist attacks, American voters would not have elected an open Muslim to be President and Commander in Chief of our entire military.
I Took The Red Pill 
He made a statement to celebrate ramadan.
Said nothing for the National Day of Prayer.
That tells me what he believes.
Now he throws a White House dinner celebrating the Islamic holy month of Ramadan for all his Muslim bros?
WWJD?
Obama along with others co-sponsored the Islamic Halal food laws,in Illinois effective Jan. 1, 2002
http://www.illinois.gov/pressreleases/ShowPressRelease.cfm?SubjectID=3&RecNum=1517
Islamic law requires an islamic holy man pray over the animal to be slaughtered and then butchered in the Islamic tradition. If Obama isn’t Islamic then he is one of the best acters to come out of Illinois.
Obama is such a citizen of the world, don’t you know, that leaving America to wallow in western traditional values, such as our Christian tradition, would just be too provincial, too uncool.
Besides, Obama has already proclaimed that we are not a Christian nation. Could that have been wishful thinking or self-projection, or both?
Harry H,
Thank you for your comment. Please see Obama Says U.S. Could Be Considered a Muslim Country and follow the links. There’s a lot there.
I’ve also written many, many posts with evidence that the United States was and is, indeed, a Christian nation. That doesn’t mean that you have to be a Christian to live here and to have your religious freedoms respected. But it does mean that our nation was built on Biblical principles, and has always endorsed Christianity. See https://itooktheredpill.wordpress.com/category/christian-nation/
Thanks for your comments, westexan.
That link is interesting, in that in one of the few times where he did something more than vote “present”, he chose to actively co-sponsor a bill to recognize “the emerging presence of Muslim culture and traditions”, in “an historical manifestation of the public and political recognition of the Muslim community”.
That shows you what his priorities are.
Hawaii will be the only State to ever have an “Islam Day”. 9/24/09
(Neil Abercrombie was also BHO the First’s good friend).
I believe, Obama is such a citizen of the U.S.A and always consider Christian tradition. I think everyone should have religious freedoms. So, we should not have any issue on this topic.
I agree.
The issue is not Obama’s religious freedoms. The issue is whether he lied about his faith in order to become President of the United States and Commander in Chief of our entire military. There is no religious test to hold office, but do you think Americans would have elected an openly Moslem man less than 8 years after 9/11/2001?
In my opinion, it appears that on the eigth anniversary of the 9/11/2001 attacks, we have a lying, ineligible (not a natural born citizen of the U.S. due to his British citizenship at birth), Islamic Jihadist, Communist, usurper acting as POTUS and CinC.
Funny how there is always a leak from the legal authorities when a republican’s information is sealed, but when it’s a democrat, like barry, nobody would dare leak the information. They might end up dead like that guy that looked at obama’s passport info.
yo,
It’s not just in the U.S. where information has been sealed and gag orders issued. That’s also been done in Kenya, where the OFFICIAL REPORT of the NATIONAL ASSEMBLY of KENYA repeatedly called Barack Obama a “Son of This Soil”.
While there is no doubt of Obama’s Muslim past and leanings I think it is far more likely as an ivy league intellectual he is truly not deeply into any religion or belief system other than his own radical secular self aggrandizing views. Certainly at least radical Islam is rejecting his advances. I would agree with the issue of faking one religion over another for political gain but I believe he is faking both. It’s a somewhat different and entirely more opportunistic assessment.
If any U.S. citizen had foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks,
you know who is the most likely suspect?
Think about it…
Someone who had previously bombed the Pentagon and U.S. Capitol building.
Someone who, as an admitted revolutionary communist, had a reason to target the most visible symbols of capitalism in the U.S. … the World Trade Centers.
Someone who just happens to be “family friends” with the current (not former) President of the United States.
I challenge anyone to disprove even a single one of the truths here:
Connect the dots…
Islam coming to the White House
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=109847
I know this is going to fall on deaf ears, but as a (admittedly liberal) reader of Michelle Malkin, I was linked here and am astonished by this garbage. Here are some refutations to a (small) collection of this ridiculous, racist, hateful crap:
“Obama has never said the words ‘Jesus is Lord, and I believe God has raised Him from the dead.'”
Yeah, he never said them IN PUBLIC. You’ve hardly demonstrated that he’s not a Christian with this point – absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
“The confessions of Obama’s own mouth reveal him to be a Muslim, not a Christian.”
Nope. He simply recalled what it was like living and studying as a young boy in a Muslim country. This argument holds as much weight as describing Bobby Jindal as a Hindu because he grew up in a Hindu household.
“As I and others have said, we have no issue with anyone’s chosen religion. But we take great issue with someone lying about it in order to get elected.”
Uh-huh. Sure. You guys have nothing against Islam? Really. Does that include
“deceitful Islamic usurper,” “Jihad: From Jakarta to the White House”?
Keep in mind that the translation to “Jihad” is not one most people who actually speak Indonesian agree with, not to mention that Obama probably had nothing to do with it.
“Obama refused to take part in any public recognition of the National Day of Prayer.”
No, he did acknowledge the National Day of Prayer:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/05/06/obama.prayer/
All he did was tone down the ceremony somewhat, probably because he didn’t want to be associated with the Christian advocacy group that was pushing it.
“Obama along with others co-sponsored the Islamic Halal food laws,in Illinois effective Jan. 1, 2002”
And? All that bill says is that if a manufacturer labels food as Halal, the Illinois Department of Agriculture has the authority to make sure that it is indeed Halal. I believe the bill was passed unanimously. It’s the same law as Kosher labeling laws – does that make all the legislators who voted for these bills Jewish? Or, to take the reducto ad absurdum further: foods that advertise themselves as being dairy-free are subject to inspection, so the people who voted for it are lactose-intolerant, or the best actors I have ever seen!
“There is no religious test to hold office, but do you think Americans would have elected an openly Moslem man less than 8 years after 9/11/2001?”
I don’t think so, and that’s a damned shame. This isn’t just the liberal in me – Colin Powell agrees. It also doesn’t mean that Obama lied about his religion.
“They might end up dead like that guy that looked at obama’s passport info.”
This is just my ignorance – what could you possibly be referring to?
“If any U.S. citizen had foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks,
you know who is the most likely suspect?”
Really? REALLY? Come on. Regarding your link to the other post, there seems to be enough of a flame war there, but I do have one thing to add:
“Truth: Indonesia does not allow dual-citizenship. If Obama/Soetoro travelled to Pakistan in 1981 under an Indonesian passport, when he was older than 18, then he would have renounced any claim he may have had to U.S. citizenship. And if so, then even if he became a U.S. citizen again at a later time, he would be a Naturalized (not Natural Born) citizen, and therefore ineligible to hold the office of President of the United States. ”
This is not true. Even if Indonesia doesn’t allow dual-citizenship (which doesn’t make any sense, but I’ll let it go), Indonesia does not have the authority to revoke Obama’s US citizenship. The US is the final arbiter on questions of citizenship.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Okay, I’m kind of tired of writing and reading this, but I do have one final point:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2008/04/02/obama_savors_some_very_special.html
Obama eats pork. In Islam, eating pork is an enormous no-no, and something he could have avoided on the campaign trail without arising suspicion. Instead, he seems to have gone out of his way to try some salami. Any responses here?
Notice Any Similarity?
oh come on. No one said the president HAS to be Christian. everyone has the right to believe in whatever religion they want to believe in.
Correct.
But they don’t have a right to lie in order to get more votes. That’s false advertising, at best.
Jesus Christ said:
Jesus Christ continued:
The Holy Bible also says:
Obama has publicly confessed the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer, reciting them with a first-rate accent. The opening lines of that call to prayer (the Adhan) includes the Shahada, the Islamic profession of faith.
Obama has not publicly confessed, “Jesus Christ is Lord.”
That’s just the facts of what Obama has and has not publicly confessed.
So, given that confession, according to the Holy Bible, Obama is not a Christian, but rather “a deceiver and an antichrist.”
Visit http://www.islamicity.com/ and you’ll see how conversions to Islam are scrolled as follows (“Br.” is for “Brother”, “Sr.” is for “Sister”)
—————————————————————-
When Barack Hussein Obama publicly confessed the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer, he “took Shahada“.
—————————————————————-
Mr. Pill, all of those people who recited the prayer did so in the desire to join the religion. If I went out on my front porch, and read aloud the prayer, fully knowing that I do not believe it, you are saying I’ve converted to Islam? Yes or No answer please.
If you recited it earnestly to another human being, the Muslim world would take that as a sign of your conversion to Islam, and if you later recanted, you would be considered an apostate, punishable by death.
Every time the Democrat[ic Soclialist]s restrict us from accessing our own oil, (whether that be in the Gulf, in oil shale, or in ANWR), we are sending money to Communist and Islamic countries to buy oil that we could have acquired ourselves.
For 40 years, every time we pay at the gas pump, we have been funding the Islamic Revival
Drill Here! Drill Now!
Pingback: Barack Hussein Obama took Shahada | We the People of the United States
Obama took SHAHADA and is MUSLIM
Mr. Ryan, those people “took Shahada” and then publically posted their response at Islamcity. Therefore, — BY DEFINITION — they are Muslim.
Now, I have a question for you… are you an idjit? You publically posted an example of your idjitness here at itooktheredpill, so by definition, you must be an idjit. Yes or No answer please.
Fritz, I’m not talking about those people who are listed online. I agree they are Muslim. They have declared that they are Muslim.
Do you believe that Obama has taken Shahada simply because he remembers the prayer chant? That’s the logic I’m trying to argue against here.You guys are desperate.
After serveral warnings about ad hominem attacks, Ryan continued to attack:
It’s really very simple and straightforward that Obama has publicly confessed the Muslim confession of faith, and has not publicly confessed the Christian confession of faith.
Ryan can rant, and call me stupid and dishonest, but that doesn’t change the truth of what Obama has and has not publicly confessed.
Ryan finished with:
Ryan’s wish has been granted.
Here’s some larger context of that NY Times interview:
With that interview, Barack Hussein Obama made it known to the Muslim world that:
1) He lived in Jakarta, the capital of the world’s most populous Muslim nation (Indonesia).
2) He comes from a line of Muslims.
3) He took Koran study classes.
4) He is aware of, and sensitive to, Muslim nationalism.
5) He recited the Shahada in Arabic.
Non-Muslims need to understand what #5 means to Muslims.
#5 is really all you need to know to understand that Obama “came out” to the Muslim world as one of them. The other four things are icing on the cake to them.
Later, as President, Obama recited the Koran multiple times. That’s another thing that is very significant to Muslims.
One thing that’s been nagging at the back of my head for a while about this has finally come forward to be acknowledged. It’s that there are many who leave Islam. Our church has contacts in the Middle East, and conversion to Christianity, while quite rare and extremely dangerous, happens.
In order to accept that Obama is, currently, a moslem simply based on his confession of the Shahadah (most likely was earnestly recited while in school in Jakarta, BTW) in the past… well, it strikes me as saying that other converts from Islam are also still moslem — which they are not.
People leave Islam for a variety of reasons, even in the Middle East. There are even atheists who once had been moslems.
Do other converts from Islam to Christianity still confess the Shahada in Arabic?
To confess those words about Mohammed is to deny that Jesus is LORD.
No, you can’t be a Christian and confess the Shahada in Arabic without being blasphemous and denying Jesus Christ before men. And if you deny Him before men, he will deny you in font of the Father.
I never stated that our President was a convert to Christianity. Converts to atheism or to any generic non-belief, if you will, would likely not have any problem with reciting the “meaningless” things from their former religion.
I would equate this to someone who still can quote the Lord’s Prayer or John 3:16, but is now atheist. To them, it is meaningless, if poetic, niceties.
I think that President Obama possibly has that view of his former studies of Islam. It reminds him of his youth, his roots, “home”.
I am not convinced he is a practicing moslem. He doesn’t pray 5 times a day (does he ever pray at all, most days?), he smokes, he consumes alcohol, and he eats pork. The latter two, not necessarily on a regular basis that I know of. I understand that all it takes to “be a moslem” is the recite the Shahadah, and mean it. I would accept that he did so in his childhood in Jakarta, but do not accept that he did so in that interview. That is what I am saying.
I accept that reciting that Shahada as a “confession” is blasphemous. Is it any less blasphemous to put the same words in print, as you did near the top of this page? By your reprinting those words, are you confessing the Shahadah? Of course you aren’t.
I also do not think our President is a Christian man, except perhaps in the most broad use of the word as an adjective, ie, “commendably generous” or “charitable”: “That was very Christian of you, Dr. Thornton, to give me that fiver.”
Today at Day by Day…
I still see President Obama as godless, rather than a moslem. And you may think I am being naive, but I think concluding that he is a moslem is too simple. Does Occam’s Razor really apply here?
Many Muslims think Obama is a Muslim, many Christians think Obama is a Christian, and many Secular Progressives think Obama is a Secular Progressive.
Obama seems to like it that way. He is all things to all people. The blank canvas where people project their own HOPEs upon him. Time thinks he’s the second coming of Ronald Reagan, even though Obama signed socialized medicine into law 50 years after Reagan spoke out strongly against socialized medicine.
I know what Obama is NOT. Obama is not a Christian Capitalist.
I’d agree with that.
His ‘religion’ leans toward whichever is politically expedient at the moment, especially if it works his political opponents to distraction. I’d like to think that’s why Boehner hasn’t given much attention to the birth certificate issue. I didn’t vote for him so he could take on the President’s qualifications (or lack thereof), but so he could oppose and counter any further legislative “advances” that the Democrats would burden us with.
Speaker Boehner, and every member of Congress, has an obligation, under the Constitution, to do so.
See Section 3 of the 20th Amendment.
Except that Mr. Obama is no longer “President-Elect”. He has been sworn in, and now holds the office of President. While I agree that Congress, as a whole, failed to uphold this Amendment in 2008, I see it as “the damage is already done”, and it is too late for this Amendment to apply, and too late for this current Congress to act. The 20th Amendment applies strictly to the beginning of the term of office for the President elect. I don’t believe it was ever anticipated that someone foreign-born would make it to the swearing-in stage.
Ergo, Mr. Barack Hussein Obama, for worse or for worser, *is* our legitimate President, duly elected and sworn-in despite his failure to qualify. At this point, it is as the Apostle Paul addressed to Timothy with regard to “endless genealogies” which “promote useless speculations rather than God’s redemptive plan.”
We are to pray for him, though, and that’s what matters more than his missing birth certificate. On the ultimate scale, which one holds more weight?
I pray for Obama.
But if he is ineligible (which I believe he is), then he is a usurper of the office. There is historical precedent for removing usurpers from office and striking all of their actions from the official record. This has been done in the Senate. There is no reason why it couldn’t or shouldnt’ be done with the Presidency.
It’s good to see that Leo Donofrio has a new post up:
What, then, is the actual process by which our Congress could remove the usurper from the office of the President? Outside of impeachment, I cannot think of any. But I don’t think there’s been enough evidence to impeach the President on the basis of his failure to qualify as a natural born citizen.
I still find it very curious that the Governor of Hawaii still has not made good on his promise to end the speculation & controversy. It’s almost as if the Discordians intervened. Fnord.
Step 1: Trust, but verify… verify that the Obama birth narrative is 100% true, by expecting Barack Obama to supply the 1 physical document that would be acceptable to meet the eligibility requirements of both the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 and the United States Constitution. What is that document? An original, long form, hard copy birth certificate with an official seal. The Constitution requires a President to be a natural born citizen, and the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 requires that:
Step 2: Supreme Court ruling on the Founder’s intent of the Constitutional requirement that a President to be a natural born citizen.
Step 3: Using the information obtained in Steps 1 & 2, determine which of the following is true:
3A) The Obama birth narrative is 100% true, and the Supreme Court rules that birth on U.S. soil is sufficient to be a “natural born citizen” of the United States. If this is the case, Obama is qualified to hold the office of President, and this issue is closed.
3B) The Obama birth narrative is 100% true, and the Supreme Court rules that birth on U.S. soil, to at least one U.S. citizen parent, is sufficient to be a “natural born citizen” of the United States. If this is the case, Obama is qualified to hold the office of President, and this issue is closed.
3C) The Obama birth narrative is 100% true, and the Supreme Court rules that birth on U.S. soil, to parents who are both U.S. citizens (by either birth or naturalization), is necessary in order to be a “natural born citizen” of the United States. If this is the case, Obama is NOT qualified to hold the office of President, and is a ursurper. See step 4 for how to handle a usurper.
3D) The Obama birth narrative is not 100% true. Either the COLB or the letter supposedly sent from President Barack Obama to Kapiolani Medical Center (or both) is/are not 100% true. Laws have been broken. If the COLB has been forged, there are consequences. If the letter to Kapiolani is not true, there are consequences (because the information was used in Kapiolani’s fundraising, and it is illegal to use fraudulent information in fundraising). Depending on what the truth of Obama’s birth narrative really is, combined with the Supreme Court’s ruling on the meaning of “natural born citizen”, Obama may or may not be a usurper (step 4), but he would undoubtedly be guilty of the high crimes and misdemeanors of forgery, perjury, obstruction of justice, etc. See step 5 for that.
Step 4: Remove a usurper. There is historical precedence for this in the Senate, when a Senator was found to have been seated prior to his having been a citizen for 9 years. He was removed from office and all of his actions were expunged from the record.
Step 5: Trial for high crimes and misdemeanors.
5A) If also a usurper, first remove the usurper and then try him in regular courts.
5B) If not also a usurper, then follow the impeachment proceedings outlined in the Constitution.
I understand that scenario 5B would likely result in the House bringing impeachment, and the Democratic Senatate acquitting Obama, unless 20 Democrats care more about the rule of law than party loyalty.
“It’s the Theology, Stupid”
appears to be available here: