Notice Any Similarity?

Anyone see the artistic similarity between this poster:


and this poster:

Obama Berlin Speech

Who’s behind “Islam on Capitol Hill?”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

21 Responses to Notice Any Similarity?

  1. Pingback: The Confessions of Obama’s Mouth « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)

  2. Ryan says:

    Holy Crap!!!!

    The angle of the text on BOTH of those posters in about 41 degrees. Both events are related to Washington. I’ve figured this out.

    #41 on the Washington Redskins is KAREEM Moore. KAREEM!!!! That name is Muslim, and if you switch it around, what do we have? Moore Kareem!! Obama is trying to get more Muslim Kareems in America!!

    You think that is enough? There’s more. Kareem Moore was born in 1984, the same as the title of the book by Orwell.

    His position is “safety” – something that the president should ensure for all Americans, but Moore was taken 180th overall in the NFL draft, signifying a 180 degree turn around from the “safety” philosophy – in other words – DANGER.

    The end is near. Repent.

  3. Ryan,

    Your satire is an EPIC FAIL.

    It’s obvious to any honest observer that the same person/group created both posters.

    But you are correct about one thing…

    The end is near… for the usurper.

    Hawaii Confirms That Obama’s Vital Records Have Been Amended.

    In general, I believe that the “dualer” issue is the more important issue, and must be resolved to support and defend the original intent of the Constitution… that, except for those who were grandfathered in by being citizens on June 21, 1788(when New Hampshire became the 9th state to ratify the Constitution and it was officially adopted), only natural born citizens, with no allegiance by blood or soil to any other nation, could become commander in chief of our military.

    That issue must be resolved so that all Presidents from this point forward are confirmed to have been born on U.S. soil, to two U.S. Citizen parents, and never having gained citizenship of any other country (via adoption, etc.) at any point in their life.

    But to get clarity on the “dualer” issue, we must first dispense with the “birther” issue. And if the “birther” issue happens to reveal that Obama was *not* born in Hawaii, then this is a coverup that is orders of magnitude worse than Watergate.

    The following evidence does not speak well for Obama on the “birther’ issue:

    1) “Barack Obama’s COLB” was first presented as a digital image posted on Daily Kos, (not his campaign web site), and it was posted there within minutes of a mostly blank COLB template and the clearly forged COLB of “Haye I.B. Ahphorgerie“.

    2) The hardcopy of “Barack Obama’s COLB” was produced at and by the Obama campaign headquarters in Chicago, not by Dr. Fukino, Director of the Hawaiian Department of Health. This hardcopy was only shown to individuals from Annenberg Political Fact Check, an organization which has been proven a) to do an inadequate job of checking facts, and b) to be highly biased in favor of Obama and against any “birther” who questions his eligibility. Barack Obama has prior connections to Annenberg, when he, along with Bill Ayers, worked on the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. We cannot trust Annenberg Political Fact Check to “certify” the hardcopy “Barack Obama COLB”, and Dr. Fukino has not vouched for it’s authenticity in either of her two News Releases:

    October 31, 2008
    July 27, 2009

    3) Consider this fact regarding Obama’s birth certificate… the only person who has been willing to sign an affidavit, under penalty of perjury, has been Lucas Smith, who swore the following under oath about an Obama Kenyan Birth Certificate:

    “The true and correct photocopy of the birth certificate obtained is attached to this affidavit as Exhibit A. I declare, certify, verify, state and affirm under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing statements of fact and descriptions of circumstances and events are true and correct.”

    4) If Obama were born in Kenya, but one of his Dunham grandparents swore that he was born in Hawaii, then Hawaii would have accepted their sworn statement as the truth.

    5) If Obama were born in Kenya, but later adopted by Lolo Soetoro in Honolulu, Hawaii, then the State of Hawaii would have issued a new birth certificate for Barry Soetoro, with the birthplace listed as Honolulu. With this current lawsuit, Leo has evidence that Obama’s birth certificate was, in fact, amended.

    6) Of whose soil is Obama a son?

    …the President-elect, Mr. Obama, is a son of the soil of this country

    …the people of the United States of America have just had a historic election where the son of this soil, Barrack Hussein Obama, has been elected the 44th President of the United States of America…

    we are the home of the President-elect of the USA…

    Who said that?

    Was that in the statements by Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Hawaii’s Department Of Health Director?


    It was in the

    Official Report of the Kenyan National Assembly Wednesday, 5th November, 2008.

    That link is from the official web site of the Kenyan Parliament.

  4. Ryan says:

    It’s obvious to any honest observer that the same person/group created both posters.

    Perhaps to a regular observer, but I am not a regular observer. I am heavily involved with graphic design professionals, and when two posters like this look that similar, you can COUNT ON the fact that they were not produced by the same people. It is obviously a copycat job by a small firm. No graphic design company, especially one with the clout to obtain such a lucrative contract would ever print a similar poster for a lesser client. NEVER EVER EVER.

    The Obama poster is a complex poster with several gradients and is extremely well composed. The Islamic poster is a terrible poster – the colours are not well chosen and the shadow overlaps the word “Washington”. It’s not a pro job. They were not made by the same people.

  5. Ryan,

    I accept your perspective. Do you accept that the creator of the “Islam on Capitol Hill” poster intentionally mimicked the Obama poster? If so, why do you think they wanted their poster to look like the Obama poster?

    I still contend that Muslims believe they have a friend in the Oval Office.

  6. Ryan says:

    They probably wanted it to look like the Obama poster because it was a great poster. Unfortunately they did not copy the part that made it great – a subtle thing in that poster is what makes it look so good – the right hand margin of the text on lines 3,4 and 5. I highly doubt this was even sent to a designer at all.

    I still contend that Muslims believe they have a friend in the Oval Office.

    There is no doubt that Obama is more inclusive of different faiths and ethnicities than was Pres. Bush. I think this is a good thing. Either way, I would agree that Muslim people are happier with Obama as president than a Republican.

    So what?

    Do you concede that White Supremacists voted almost exclusively for Bush? Do you concede that they all hate Obama as much as you?

    Like it or not, you only have two parties with a chance to form government, and certain groups who are not affiliated with either will take a side. You can’t take that as reciprocal support.

    When you stretch so far to smear this man, it makes people think you don’t have anything of substance.

  7. Ryan,

    I concede that the “Islam on Capitol Hill” web site says:

    The Athan will be chanted on Capitol Hill, echoing off of the Lincoln Memorial, the Washington Monument and other great edifices that surround Capitol Hill

    Thousands of Muslims from all races, creeds, colors and ethnicities will gather for the sole purpose of prayer

    I concede that the Athan, also known as the Adhan, also known as the Islamic call to prayer, also known as the Arabic call to prayer, has the following opening lines (Sunni version) when translated to English:

    Allah is the greatest
    I bear witness that there is no deity except Allah
    I bear witness that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah

    I concede that the Muslims whom I know (including one of the authors of this book) tell me that this confession is what makes you a Muslim.

    (Similarly to how confessing “Jesus Christ is Lord” and believing in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead is what makes you a Christian).

    I concede that the confessions of Obama’s mouth make him a Muslim, not a Christian.

    I concede that Muslims are much happier with a Muslim in the Oval Office than a Christian in the Oval Office.

  8. And Ryan,

    Lest you think I am completely ignorant of Islam, you should know that I have lived in a Muslim country, and my wife is the grandaughter of a Hajji.

  9. Ryan says:

    But Mr. Pill, you just put that prayer on your website – in writing! I suppose that also makes you a Muslim. Or were you just referencing the prayer – like Obama.

    Are you honestly dumb enough to think he is a Muslim? A special “pork eating” kind of Muslim?

    Personally I don’t think he is at all religious.

    You, however, will always believe whatever you want to believe.

  10. I didn’t confess those words with my mouth.

    Whether you understand it or not, salvation is based on the confession of your mouth.

  11. Ryan said:

    Personally I don’t think he is at all religious.

    You think like the following commenter at Michelle Malkin’s site:

    On September 21st, 2009 at 4:07 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Obama is not a Muslim anymore, and hasn’t been since age 7. The TUCC was for political purposes, although I’m sure he shared Rev. Wright’s views about white people in general.

    Obama is a Marxist. Religion is the opiate of the masses, remember? It explains the bitter clingers/Bible comment he made to his own kind in San Francisco.

    Now, Obama can give Islamic greetings, and recite Islamic prayer, in perfect Arabic. He may have some nostalgia for the closest thing to a real father he ever had, his Indonesian step father who cared enough to take him to the mosque every Friday for prayers. Soetero didn’t abandon Obama’s mother Stanley and the children, she abandoned him.

    But Obama is an atheist, and while he may have a soft spot for the Islamic faith, he is technically an apostate.

    If the Muslims are smart, they will realize Obama shares many of their goals, specifically the destruction of the United States as a representative democracy (republic) with a generally capitalist economic system.

    On September 21st, 2009 at 4:33 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Obama was a Muslim, four decades ago, and certainly proclaimed the Islamic profession of faith when he was.

    He is almost certainly an atheist now.

    I replied

    I understand your belief that Obama, as a Marxist, is an atheist. Over at HotAir, the atheist AllahPundit also believes that Obama is an atheist.

    Obama has some Christians believing that he is a Christian, Muslims believing that he is a Muslim, and atheists believing he is an atheist.

    What is relevant is:

    1) He is most certainly not what he has claimed to be (a Christian).

    2) Muslims know they have a friend in the White House.

    3) Marxists know they have a friend in the White House.

    Marxists and Muslims have already joined forces as part of the “57 states” of the OIC.

    I believe it was very intentional when Obama said “57 states”.

  12. Ryan says:

    First of all, no seven year old is a Muslim or a Christian. A seven year old is not old enough to understand any faith or belief system, let alone make a “proclamation” of faith . So if he hasn’t been a Muslim since he was seven, he hasn’t been one at all. I grew up in a predominantly Italian community where everyone, and I mean everyone but me, was Catholic. I know all of the prayers, all of the rituals, most of the saints, and I can speak a heck of a lot of Italian in a perfect accent. But I’m not a Catholic, or an Italian, and never have been.

    Whether you understand it or not, salvation is based on the confession of your mouth.

    Nice loophole. What about sign language? Does that count? What if you communicate with a assistive language device (like a keyboard)? What if I’m a scholar studying theology, and I read the Muslim prayer to my class aloud? Am I a Muslim then? Don’t be stupid.

  13. gopcounterculture says:

    Uncanny! And creepy.

  14. Aaron says:


    Your attempt to plug a so-called “loophole” was a joke. The fact that you would throw “what if’s” like that out as though they were serious points speaks greater volumes than the straws you were grasping at. Hey, while you’re at it, why not throw in a “what if” about novel writers who eventually type enough pages that the individual letters can be picked from the text to form the Muslim prayer? Don’t be stupid.

  15. Ryan says:


    So anyone who reads a Muslim prayer aloud is automatically a Muslim?

    Are you that dense?

  16. Ryan,

    Ask a Muslim, “What must I do to become a Muslim?”

  17. Aaron says:


    Really? Another “So you…” point? How many more straw-men are you going to try and pull? Come back when you can do something better than that same worn out, cheap, typical leftist tactic.

  18. Ryan says:

    Aaron – Come back when you want to back up your claims, and answer my questions.

  19. Aaron says:

    Ryan, what claim? That you constantly use straw-men? You’ve already backed that one up several different times for me, there’s noting I need to do to back up that claim.

    Maybe you’re talking about my claim that you used ridiculous contrivances to support your attack on Mr Red? Is that the claim you speak of? Once again, you’ve already backed up that claim for me, right there in your text.

    You want me to answer a question you ask, try asking honest and legitemate questions instead of veiled (or not so veiled) attacks.

  20. baysailor says:

    Well, folks, it’s been interesting reading. Amazing to see how much ink you can spill over such silly issues. (Not talking to you Ryan – I respect your attempts to inject a little common sense in here – should you still be reading this blog.) So, I do bounce around to check out the “other side” now and then (sort of like listening to Limbaugh or Hannity once in a while when driving) but this place is not worth revisiting. Enjoy your echo chamber.

  21. patricia says:

    Both sides are of interest to me. After being blasted in the face in a recent (past) relationship (he can’t tolerate i am not yet at the same advanced point on the conservative curve he is) I am taking Mr. Pill’s and Aaron’s side. Ryan you have great points about the posters. I am a graphic designer. Mr. Pill your stretching was just that, a stretch that made you look rabid and throwing straw men yourself. As a graphic designer as a general lot we are infamously ignorant of government workings and the Constitution. So due to real effort and careful logic and piecing points together, I side with Aaron and Mr. Pill. This man is a liar, able to f___ you over without blinking. He is a danger to our underpinnings of capitalism and democracy. He has Animals closely working with him and for him, can anyone not know about Chicago and ACORN yet? Oh yeah, most people in the arts industries, higher education, and entertainment industry. So Look at the PATTERNS & ACTIONS not the abusive retorts and straw men from either side. Some homework :Look up
    straw men. And ask yourselves, what did Obama ever say exactly what He meant by HOPE, in concrete terms as a president? Look at what who he is lifting, how=taxes, and on whose backs? BTW Sect Treasury Paulson stunk under Bush and Obama kept him on? Probably no one wanted that thankless job at this time.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s