Who is “Inspired” to “Bring an Empire to its Knees”?

Posted on September 18, 2008 by itooktheredpill

Barack Hussein Obama:

But my journey is part of a larger journey – one shared by all who’ve ever sought to apply the values of their faith to our society. It’s a journey that takes us back to our nation’s founding, when none other than a UCC church inspired the Boston Tea Party and helped bring an Empire to its knees.

Whose faith? Not that of the Founders. They weren’t fighting to “bring an Empire to its knees”. No, that would be the faith of Malcolm X…

Watch this video and understand Obama’s “inspiration”. 

You will never get real freedom and recognition between black and white people in this country without destroying the country, without destroying the present political system, without destroying the present economic system, without rewriting the entire constitution. It will be a complete destruction of everything that America supposedly stands for.

–Malcolm X

Only Malcolm X’s autobiography seemed to offer something different. His repeated acts of self-creation spoke to me. The blunt poetry of his words. His unadorned insistence on respect. He promised a new and uncompromising order, martial in its discipline.

–Barack Hussein Obama

“martial in its discipline“?  As in Martial Law?

Is Barack Hussein Obama the “Chosen One” to fulfill William Ayers’ forgotten communist manifesto: Prairie Fire?

Ayers is a Violent, Revolutionary Communist. What is Obama?

Can you handle the TRUTH? 

Each of those TRUTH statements is verifiably true.  The questions are very serious questions. 

An honest media and executive branch would seek honest answers to those questions.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

30 Responses to Who is “Inspired” to “Bring an Empire to its Knees”?

  1. DagneyTaggartsPoptart says:
    September 19, 2008 at 1:39 pm

    This guy is dangerous

  2. itooktheredpill says:
    September 19, 2008 at 5:48 pm

    DagneyTaggartsPoptart,

    Yes, extremely dangerous. And the majority of his supporters don’t have any idea how extreme the CHANGE he wants is.

  3. Thomas Shawn says:
    September 20, 2008 at 8:06 am

    I suspect that few of his supporters even know who Malcolm X is.

  4. Pingback: Understanding The Domestic Enemies « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)

  5. TooMuchTime says:
    September 23, 2008 at 6:57 pm

    Just read Liberal Fascism by Jonah Goldberg. It explains this line very well:

    He promised a new and uncompromising order, marshall in its discipline.

    Everything is about the “new order” and mobilizing people to do your bidding.

  6. MeeMee says:
    September 24, 2008 at 1:46 am

    Did he mean “martial” when he said “marshall”? “Martial” means military.
    From Websters:
    1 : of, relating to, or suited for war or a warrior
    2 : relating to an army or to military life
    3 : experienced in or inclined to war; warlike

    so “marshall in its discipline” is “disciplined like the military”?

  7. itooktheredpill says:
    September 24, 2008 at 3:04 am

    MeeMee,

    Thank you for your comment.

    I take it the same way you do…as in “Martial Law”. I refuse to purchase the book, but I need to go to a book store and look up this passage to see whether it has “marshall” or “martial”…another blogger has it as “martial” and includes several more Malcolm X quotes.

    Wikipedia has this to say about Martial Law:

    Martial law is the system of rules that takes effect when the military takes control of the normal administration of justice.

    Martial law is sometimes imposed during wars or occupations in the absence of any other civil government. Examples of this form of military rule include Germany and Japan after World War II or the American South during the early stages of Reconstruction. In addition it is used by governments to enforce their rule, for example after a coup d’état (Thailand 2006), when threatened by popular protests (Tiananmen Square protests of 1989), or to crack down on the opposition (Poland 1981). Martial law can also be declared in cases of major natural disasters; however most countries use a different legal construct, such as a “state of emergency”.

    In many countries martial law imposes particular rules, one of which is curfew. Often, under this system, the administration of justice is left to a military tribunal, called a court-martial. The suspension of the writ of habeas corpus is likely to occur.

    Keep in mind that “Black Liberation Theology” is a not really a theology based on “liberation”, it is based on “revenge”. If it was a theology based on “liberation”, they would put their focus on Jesus Christ:

    Then Jesus said to those Jews who believed Him, “If you abide in My word, you are My disciples indeed. And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”

    They answered Him, “We are Abraham’s descendants, and have never been in bondage to anyone. How can You say, ‘You will be made free’?”

    Jesus answered them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, whoever commits sin is a slave of sin. And a slave does not abide in the house forever, but a son abides forever. Therefore if the Son makes you free, you shall be free indeed.

    John 8:31-36

    Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.

    John 14:6

    Now, connect the dots…
    Since Jesus is the truth, i.e. “Jesus” = “the truth”, then we can replace the words “the truth” with the word “Jesus”, and we get:

    “And you shall know Jesus, and Jesus shall make you free.”

    Now THAT is “Liberation Theology”! And it is for people of all skin colors!

    “Black Liberation Theology” is nothing more than the thoughts of Malcolm X and Saul Alinsky wrapped together in a Christian Façade.

    I say again that “Black Liberation Theology” is a not really a theology based on “liberation”, it is based on “revenge”. Believers of this so-called “theology” do not follow Jesus Christ and do not believe in foregiveness. They believe in revenge. They want to take every crime that was ever comitted against people with dark skin, and now commit those crimes against people with light skin. They want to give habeas corpus rights to Islamic terrorists and take habeas corpus rights away from white Christians.

    If Barack Hussein Obama is a Christian, why can’t he confess with his mouth the three simple words?
    Jesus is LORD!

  8. Pingback: “Yes, We Can!” –> “¡Sí se puede!” –> Alinsky Radicals « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)

  9. Robert says:
    September 26, 2008 at 6:25 pm

    Not only do the followers of “Black Liberation theology” (with all the distortions in meaning inherent in anything connected to Marxism) believers in revenge, but also in the “Two Wrongs Make a Right” fallacy. They have given a crystal-clear declaration of war against the citizens of the United States of America. We better prepare now to defend ourselves and fight back if necessary should the electoral result in November make it necessary.

  10. Pingback: ACORN Watch: When it rains, it pours By Michelle Malkin • October 8, 2008 11:09 PM | OBAMA ACORN

  11. Pingback: Spread The Wealth Around « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)

  12. Pingback: Who Wants to Incite Riots and Why? « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)

  13. Pingback: Obama. Ayers! Obama. Ayers! « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)

  14. Pingback: Destroyed From Within: America’s Final Days of Freedom « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)

  15. Pingback: You Say You Want A Revolution? « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)

  16. Pingback: Who’s Your Daddy? « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)

  17. Pingback: Defend Our Constitution and Our Country From Jihad « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)

  18. itooktheredpill says:
    November 14, 2008 at 1:24 pm

    MeeMee,

    I was originally quoting the text from the YouTube video, which had the word “marshall” to go along with the Obama audio.

    I have changed it to “martial” now because that makes more sense and is the way that American Thinker quoted Obama.

  19. Pingback: Bill Ayers: “Unrepentant Terrorist” and Obama “Family Friend” « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)

  20. Pingback: America in Crisis: Are we Preparing for Martial Law? « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)

  21. Pingback: What’s Going On? « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)

  22. Pingback: Al Gore, George Orwell, Adolf Hitler, and Barack Obama « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)

  23. Pingback: Matt Drudge, Please Correct Your Headline « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)

  24. itooktheredpill says:
    June 5, 2010 at 10:53 pm

    It has been advanced that both papers printed identical lists as the general rule. As I mentioned before, this was pointed out to add more “weight” to the (ahem) proof these newspaper birth announcements lend to obama’s birth story… So I pulled a sample size of ten days from each paper. I began the splendidly tedious process of comparing the incidence of the same birth announcements being listed in both papers. Mainly with an eye towards how often they matched in exact order.The only time this occurred in that particular way within the ten days that I researched, was on the dates that had obama’s birth announcements.

    And I even took the extra steps of comparing editions to a three day range (edition before, same date, edition after) of the sister publication. So, I tried to cover all the bases in a fair comparison.

    Well, OK. The ONE and ONLY time that the two papers published the birth list, beginning at the first announcement, in order, was in the editions that obama’s birth announcement appeared. This was indeed the only time that these announcements were printed this way, as the closest the papers came to doing this again never had all the same names listed in the exact same order. I figured the ten day sample would give conclusive data as to if this was uncommon.

    That wasn’t the only anomaly she found… follow the link for more.

  27. Pingback: Who Said “A war is coming” and “the U.S. is going to end soon”? « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)

  28. itooktheredpill says:
    January 25, 2011 at 12:48 pm

    Basic Globalization Revolution Theory:
    Our computers, information technology, energy, even some food is all imported from authoritarian nations whose workers make less than dollars a day . Like the Romans who, at the end of their reign, had three slaves for every citizen, the United States, because of globalization, is completely dependant on slave labor. It would only take organized strikes (shut downs) from a small coalition of nations led for example by China to bring us to our knees.

Leave a comment