Who’s Your Daddy?

In your speech “A Politics of Conscience“, delivered in Hartford, CT on June 23, 2007, you said:

My father, who I didn’t know, returned to Kenya when I was just two.

Why did you claim that you didn’t know your biological father?

Why did you make no mention of the time you met Barack Hussein Obama in Hawaii?

Is it because your biological father really wasn’t Barack Hussein Obama, but rather Malcolm X?  More picture comparisons here.

Why have you fought to keep your Official Birth Certificate sealed?

You have yet to produce a Birth Certificate proving that you meet the Constitutional pre-requisite of being a Natural Born Citizen of the United States of America.

The following lawsuit before the United States Supreme Court goes on:

Justice Souter’s Clerk has informed Mr. Berg that Mr. Berg’s application for an injunction to stay the November 4th election has been denied.

The defendants are required to respond to the Writ of Certiorari by December first, after which Mr. Berg will have an opportunity to respond.

The candidate known as Barack Hussein Obama II is NOT the President-elect. 

Yesterday’s elections did NOT elect Barack Hussein Obama II as the next President of the United States.  Yesterday’s elections were for the electors who will, as members of the electoral college, vote for our next President. 

There will not be a President-elect until the electoral college meets, votes, and that vote is certified by the United States Senate. Electors and Senators are sworn to:

support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; and bear true faith and allegiance to the same

 “Support and defend the Constitution of the United States” includes ensuring that any candidate they elect has met the Constitutional pre-requisites for the office of President of the United States:

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

Candidates for President must prove that they meet the three Constitutional prerequisites for the office of President.

The candidate known as Barack Hussein Obama II has yet to prove, using a certified Birth Certificate, that he meets the “Natural Born Citizen of the United States” prerequisite. Electors and Senators have a sworn obligation to support and defend our Constitution…that includes certifying that Obama was born a Natural Born Citizen and never relinquished his U.S. Citizenship to become an Indonesian citizen.

If the candidate known as Barack Hussein Obama II cannot prove he meets the Constitutional pre-requisites, then the electors should support and defend the Constitution of the United States by refusing to elect this man President of the United States.  This isn’t just a technicality.  This is supporting and defending our Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, including a candidate who could very well be (and has yet to prove that he is not) the son of the man who said:

You will never get real freedom and recognition between black and white people in this country without destroying the country, without destroying the present political system, without destroying the present economic system, without rewriting the entire constitution. It will be a complete destruction of everything that America supposedly stands for.

Malcolm X

Calling for “destroying the present political system” and “rewriting the entire constitution” made Malcolm X a domestic enemy of the Constitution of the United States.  The candidate known as Barack Hussein Obama II said:

Only Malcolm X’s autobiography seemed to offer something different. His repeated acts of self-creation spoke to me. The blunt poetry of his words. His unadorned insistence on respect. He promised a new and uncompromising order, martial in its discipline.

–Barack Hussein Obama


But my journey is part of a larger journey – one shared by all who’ve ever sought to…bring an Empire to its knees.

Honestly or dishonestly, legally or illegally, Obama received votes for more electoral college electors than John McCain.  But Obama is not yet the President-elect.

Obama Creating a “Constitutional Crisis”: Eligible to Become President? Prove It!

We’ve lost an election, but there is still time to support and defend our Constitution.

UPDATE: Why did al-Zawahiri link Obama, “son of a Muslim”, and Malcolm X?

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

24 Responses to Who’s Your Daddy?

  1. jim hamilton says:

    Dude you need to get a life! JACKASS

  2. Thomas Shawn says:

    F- The Constitution. All hail Ayatollah Obama. For me, time for more guns and religion.

  3. YouShouldTakeAChillPill says:

    Lighten up Jim…I rather enjoy watching RedPill grasping at straws. Its quite amusing!

    I’m trying to figure out who is the bigger idiot: the guy who writes about Obama being Malcolm X’s secret son or the guy who post a link to it in his blog.

    In the meantime, I am still waiting for his answer on how the lying, biased, communist, socialist polls got it right!

  4. This is fascinating, and the physical resemblance is striking. The articles on the possibility of Frank Marshall Davis being his father are also interesting, have you seen those? At Astute Bloggers, I believe. Love your comments on hotair, btw.

  5. Gus says:

    I knew the election of a black man was going to drive some people nuts, but I didn’t think it would be quite this amusing. Great stuff, Mr. Nutbar!

  6. Gus,
    You and this guy are talking about a “black man”, not I.

    We are all one human race. The amount of melanin in our skin is irrelevant in this discussion.

    I wish people would realize that fulfilling the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s dream means that we should judge people by the content of their character, not the color of their skin.

    My posts about Obama are judging the content of his character … why did he say, “My father, who I didn’t know” when he had, in fact, met the man who he claims is his father? Something doesn’t line up…either he was lying when he said “My father, who I didn’t know”, or he is lying when he says Barack Hussein Obama was his father. Which statement is a lie?

    I am against Barack Obama for some of the same reasons I am against Bill Ayers, and it has nothing to do with the color of their skin.

    But you know who does judge Obama by the color of his skin? The media. Try to find a MSM story about Obama that doesn’t include the word “black”…it’s like trying to find a needle in a haystack.

    Voting for, or against, a candidate because of their skin color is racist. Barack Obama was helped by racism in his favor a lot more than he was hurt by racism against him.

    Obama has yet to prove that he meets the Constitutional prerequisite of being a Natural Born Citizen of the United States. I expect the electors and Senators to uphold their oath to support and defend the Constitution. If Obama can’t prove he meets the prerequisites, then he is ineligible for the job. Just like any other job in this country where you are required to prove your Citizenship.

    If Obama can prove he is a Natural Born Citizen, or if he is not forced to prove that he is, he will become the President-Elect. His policies as President would be even worse for this country than Carter’s were. The candidate that many people thought would bring “Hope” would actually bring economic despair. Obama would “spread the wealth” globally (see his Global Poverty Act), and bring this country, which he considers an empire, to its knees.

    Sometimes you have to go through a Carter to get a Reagan. If Obama takes office, I just hope the next Reagan can undo the damage that Obama does over the next four years (assuming that we even have free elections four years from now).

  7. … I know deep down that some wingnuts will never change. Honestly, who still imagines that Obama’s father is Malcolm X, And were it true, what would it matter?

    What would it matter?

    What would it matter if Obama’s entire narrative has been a lie?

    What would it matter if the son of Malcolm X was close to becoming President of the United States and Commander-in-Chief of our armed forces?

    Malcolm X called for “a complete destruction of everything that America supposedly stands for”.

    Obama said “my journey is part of a larger journey – one shared by all who’ve ever sought to…bring an Empire to its knees”.

    What would it matter if a Socialist/Communist Muslim Jihadist became President and wanted to destroy America and bring it to its knees?

    What would it matter? Are you kidding me?

    Unfortunately, Dylan, you’re not. And you think I’m the nut. Sad.

  8. obamafan says:

    can’t wait 4 americas downfall. we snuck him in office. only a matter of time.

  9. Hillary says:

    The resemblance is too uncanny to be coincidence. You’ve piqued my curiosity. I need to know more…

  10. gdh1 says:

    Malcolm is definitely Obama’s father. In fact, I’ve heard that in some states, “pictures vaguely resembling each other” can now be used in court to establish paternity in lieu of DNA evidence. Similarly, Senators with a medical background can diagnose patients via videotape.

  11. gdh1,

    It’s not too late for DNA evidence. Get samples from Barack Obama, Maya Kassandra Soetoro-Ng (the woman he says is his half-sister), and from one or more of Malcolm X’s daughters.

    What if Obama showed common DNA with Malcolm’s daughters?


    What if Obama did not show common DNA with the woman he claims is his half-sister? (friends of Stanley Ann Dunham say they never saw her pregnant with Barack).


    What is the man hiding?

  12. gdh1 says:

    You’re right, it’s not too late. It’s also not too late for you to provide DNA evidence proving that YOU are not Malcolm’s illegitimate child. I never saw your mother pregnant with you. Where is YOUR certified birth certificate? WHY HAVEN’T YOU PRODUCED IT? WHAT ARE YOU HIDING?

  13. I’m not the one who wants to become the next President and “bring an Empire to its knees”.

    If I were running for President, I would present my certified birth certificate when I announced my candidacy.

    You see, I actually care about our Constitution, and quote it properly, unlike Barack Obama who misquoted our Constitution and presumably believes he was elected by “We the people” of the world.

  14. gdh1 says:

    I think it goes to the issue of credibility and bias. I mean, absent any evidence to the contrary, we can presume that Malcolm X is your father, and this blog is nothing more than the bitter rantings of Obama’s estranged half-brother. Therefore, you owe it to your readers to prove your credibility by posting your certified birth certificate as well as results of the DNA tests that show exactly how you are related to Malcolm X. Until you do, it’s hard to take anything you write seriously.

    While you’re at it, you should also bolster your credibility by providing evidence that you do not have sex with goats, and telling us the precise date when you stopped beating your wife.

  15. If you think you are being original with the goat and wife beating comments, sorry. I’ve had that bile spewed at me before, and it doesn’t phase me. That seems to be standard Democratic ad hominem attack material.

    But I am glad you brought up the issues of credibility and bias

    Obama on Ayers, during the campaign:

    This is a guy who lives in my neighborhood, who’s a professor of English in Chicago who I know and who I have not received some official endorsement from. He’s not somebody who I exchange ideas from on a regular basis.

    And the notion that somehow as a consequence of me knowing somebody who engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago, when I was 8 years old, somehow reflects on me and my values doesn’t make much sense, George.

    So this kind of game in which anybody who I know, regardless of how flimsy the relationship is, that somehow their ideas could be attributed to me, I think the American people are smarter than that. They’re not going to suggest somehow that that is reflective of my views, because it obviously isn’t.

    Ayers on Obama, after the campaign is over:

    We had served together on the board of a foundation, knew one another as neighbors and family friends, held an initial fund-raiser at my house, where I’d made a small donation to his earliest political campaign.

    Ayers’ donation, no matter how small, is an indication that Ayers felt Obama would represent Ayers’ priorities in government. That is why Ayers gave Obama money and why Ayers used his own home to help introduce Obama to other influential and like-minded people. Ayers helped get Obama the only executive experience Obama ever had…as chairman of that board they served on together. All of this is not a “flimsy” relationship with “a guy who lives in my neighborhood”.

    Obama has zero credibility on the Ayers issue.

    Ayers is a Violent, Revolutionary Communist. What is Obama?

    Is this some “kind of game in which anybody who I know, regardless of how flimsy the relationship is, that somehow their ideas could be attributed to me”? Hardly. Obama’s own words and actions are what attribute Ayers’ ideas to him.

    Again, Obama has zero credibility on the Ayers issue, just like Obama has no credibility on the “Natural Born” and “Lifetime” Citizen issue. He has not proven that he was born in Hawaii as he claims. He has not proven that he ceased to be a U.S. Citizen (if he even was one at the time) when he was adopted by his Indonesian step-father.

    Obama is the one lacking credibility.

    And, as for bias, why did the media ignore Ayers before the election, and now they parade him?

  16. gdh1 says:

    Interesting response there, Malcolm Jr. Your post is what is known as a “non-denial denial”. Can we therefore presume from your silence that you ARE in fact a goat-buggering, wife-beating, bastard child of a black Muslim? Your silence speaks volumes.

    Look, I’m sorry that others have responded with ad hominem attacks. I can’t imagine why anyone would be reluctant to take your arguments seriously. And I promise I’m not spewing bile. Nor am I accusing you of spousal abuse or any other crimes. (I mean, for all I know you live with your parents and have never even had sex, much less sex with a goat.) I’m just saying that I read many blogs in order to get my information, and I like to be able to assess the credibility of the blogger and know for certain that he’s not a goat fucker. But as long as these serious allegations continue to swirl, it’s hard to assess your credibility.

    Once you have posted counter-evidence disproving these rumors, I will be happy to respond to your other posts.

  17. gdh1,

    This is your one and only warning that if you continue to post vulgar and obscene comments I will delete them and block your IP address.

    Weak-minded people resort to attacking the man (ad hominem attacks) when they are unable or unwilling to atack the argument.

    A “non-denial denial”? Interesting you should say that, because…
    That would be true in Obama’s non-response to the Berg lawsuit…

    The facts presented by Mr. Berg in Berg v. Obama ARE NOT IN GENUINE DISPUTE and, at his peril, Senator Obama has a duty to refute them. As a United States Court of Appeals has held, “Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading.” See United States v. Prudden, 424 F.2d 1021 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 831(1970).

    Read this.

  18. Pingback: Defend Our Constitution and Our Country From Jihad « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)

  19. Francesca says:

    Obama looks like his mother. Just look at pics of each of them.

  20. Francesca,

    Obama looks like his mother. Just look at pics of each of them.

    Obama also looks like Oprah Winfrey. Just look at a picture of them together.

  21. It has been advanced that both papers printed identical lists as the general rule. As I mentioned before, this was pointed out to add more “weight” to the (ahem) proof these newspaper birth announcements lend to obama’s birth story… So I pulled a sample size of ten days from each paper. I began the splendidly tedious process of comparing the incidence of the same birth announcements being listed in both papers. Mainly with an eye towards how often they matched in exact order.The only time this occurred in that particular way within the ten days that I researched, was on the dates that had obama’s birth announcements.

    And I even took the extra steps of comparing editions to a three day range (edition before, same date, edition after) of the sister publication. So, I tried to cover all the bases in a fair comparison.

    Well, OK. The ONE and ONLY time that the two papers published the birth list, beginning at the first announcement, in order, was in the editions that obama’s birth announcement appeared. This was indeed the only time that these announcements were printed this way, as the closest the papers came to doing this again never had all the same names listed in the exact same order. I figured the ten day sample would give conclusive data as to if this was uncommon.

    That wasn’t the only anomaly she found… follow the link for more.

  22. Go ahead and call this speaker and his audience “racist”…

    I’m not the only one asking, “Who’s Your Daddy?!?”

  23. I’m not endorsing the web site shown on that video. I just find that particular video enlightening… listen to how the audience accepts the speaker’s hypothesis…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s