Ayers made those comments in the New York Times on 9/11/2001… the very day that New York was bombed again… that time with two airplanes. Coincidence? Maybe yes, maybe no. Examine the facts and draw your own conclusion.
If someone you knew admitted in 2001 that they were unrepentant about their previous terrorist bombing activities, would you remain their “family friend”?
Why did Obama remain “family friends” with Ayers after what Ayers was quoted as saying to the New York Times in 2001?
Before the 2008 election, the media tried to downplay the Obama-Ayers association, but after the election Ayers admitted the truth about their relationship.
Sarah Palin was right.
It doesn’t matter how old Obama was when Ayers and Dohrn exploded their bombs, some of which killed innocent people.
It matters how old Obama was when Ayers said, “I don’t regret setting bombs. I feel we didn’t do enough.”
Ayers said that in 2001, and Obama was indeed still “palling around” with his “family friend” in 2008.
If Obama truly believes what he said today, “Anytime a bomb is used like this, it is an act of terror”, then why did he remain friends with an unrepentant terrorist?
Would you be friends with an unrepentant terrorist bomber?
Would you vote against legislation that was intended to prevent infanticide?
Would you vote for someone who answered “Yes” to both of those questions?
If you voted for Obama, you voted for someone who voted against legislation intended to prevent infanticide, and remained friends with an unrepentant terrorist bomber.