DIAPERS
…Get the crap out of Washington, D.C., it’s time for a CHANGE!
—-
UPDATE: Hillbuzz had the same idea…
Advertisements
Verse of the day- Philippians 1:21“For to me, to live is Christ, and to die is gain.”
- Philippians 1:21
Search the Bible
Search this site
Pages
Top Posts
- What Does "A More Perfect Union" Mean?
- Destroyed From Within: The Four Stages of Ideological Subversion
- God, Moses, Crosses and the Bible in Our Capitol Building
- Natural Born Citizen vs. Native Born Citizen
- The Parable of 10 Men in a Bar
- “For the Glory of God and Advancement of the Christian Faith”
- Jesus vs. Global Poverty
- He who corrects a scoffer...
- In Congress, March 16, 1776
- Michelle Obama, Birther
Categories
Meta
Blogroll
- "Comprehensive Analysis of Obama LFBC PDF File"
- "UNDOUBTEDLY A FRAUD"
- 100,000,000,000,000 Dollar Challenge
- Affidavit of Michael Zullo, Lead Investigator, Cold Case Posse
- Ann Barnhardt
- Article II Super PAC
- Barack Hussein Obama took Shahada
- Bill Whittle Videos
- Breitbart
- Butterdezillion
- CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
- CDR Kerchner's Blog
- CHANGE in Debt since Dems took Majority Control on 1/3/2007
- Citizen Wells
- CommieBlaster
- Day By Day Cartoon
- Debt (excluding "Extraordinary Measures") to the Penny and Who Holds It
- Declaration 2.0
- Declaration Entertainment
- Discover the Networks
- Discover the Networks (SEARCH)
- Dr. Kate
- Faulkner Mural – The Constitution
- Faulkner Mural – The Declaration
- For God, Family, and Country
- Guess Which Collectivist said it…
- Heliogenic Climate Change
- Hope-N-Change cartoons
- Investigating Obama
- IowaHawk (David Burge) Blog
- IowaHawk (David Burge) Twitter
- IowaHawk at Breitbart
- Jihad: From Jakarta To The Whitehouse
- John Hayward ("Doctor Zero")
- Ladysforest
- Learn WordPress
- Leo Donofrio, Esquire
- Liberty Unyielding
- Loyal to Liberty (Alan Keyes)
- Mario Apuzzo, Esquire
- MCSO Cold Case Posse
- Michael Ramirez Political Cartoons on IBD
- Michael Ramirez Political Cartoons on Twitter
- Michelle Obama’s trip to Spain was not “Tone Deaf”, it was Pitch-Perfect…
- MissTickly
- My Tweets About Pelosi
- Natural Born Citizen
- No Runny Eggs
- PoliNation
- Predictable History, Unpredictable Past
- Real Science – Steven Goddard / Tony Heller
- Sharyl Attkisson
- Texas Darlin
- The Obama File
- The People's Cube
- The Post & Email
- The Right Scoop
- Thomas Sowell
- Trevor Loudon's New Zeal
- Twitchy (Twitter feed)
- Twitchy (web page)
- WallBuilders
- Watts Up With That?
- We the People of the United States (WTPOTUS)
- WordPress Support
Archives
- September 2016
- August 2016
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- February 2013
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- September 2006
Twitter Updates
- RT @bethanyshondark: Want diversity and tolerance? Stop demonizing conservatives jns.org/latest-article… 4 days ago
- RT @DLoesch: Typical progressive male sexualizing women with whom he disagrees. Please evolve. twitter.com/watchmannn/sta… 1 week ago
- RT @RealJamesWoods: This is all you will ever need to see to understand what needs to be done by the #DOJ. https://t.co/64uATWgZv0 2 weeks ago
- RT @townhallcom: ABC, NBC, And CBS Pretty Much Bury IT Scandal Engulfing Debbie Wasserman Schultz's Office trib.al/2EHYgzz 3 weeks ago
- RT @realDonaldTrump: Any senator who votes against starting debate is telling America that you are fine w/ the #OCareNightmare! Remarks: h… 3 weeks ago
- Treasury Direct – Debt
- Debt to the Penny for 08/16/2017
You’ll enoy this one
You’re right. That’s a riot!!!
LOL… repeatedly…
… still chuckling…
Thanks for sharing that.
On a much more serious note, here’s something to ponder…
How would you categorize or classify a person who said this today:
Is that a “Right-wing-nut”?
Is that a “Tea Party Protester”?
In today’s world, I think the MSM and the left side of the blogosphere would use such terms to describe the person speaking those words.
But that’s actually a quote from the same Democratic President of the United States that is called a “hero” by Tim Kaine, the person who wrote the blog post on Democrats.org about the new Democrat logo.
And who was that Democratic President who spoke those words quoted above?
Harry Truman.
More great logos here: http://michellemalkin.com/2010/09/15/the-new-look-democrats/
Looks like I’m not the only one who thought of “D for Diapers… Change that matters”….
Wow. Toilet humor? Is that what you guys have sunk to?
Wow. You have the nerve to say that, after the depths to which the Democratic Socialists have sunk?
Math,
If you love the new logo so much, go get your free bumper sticker and display it with pride!
And note what the guys from Hillbuzz said on that Get a Free Democrats Bumper Sticker post at Democrats.org…
The Democratic Socialists’ insistance on forcing Obamacare down our throats, despite our screaming “STOP!“, will mean severe losses for Democrats in each of the next three election cycles. They will end up with impotent minorities in both houses of Congress once each incumbent has had to defend their votes in favor of a massive bill that they didn’t write, didn’t read, and didn’t debate on C-SPAN as Obama promised no less than 8 times.
They thought they could implement any and all of their Marxist dreams, regardless of what the voters wanted. Democrats greatly miscalculated, and this election is the first of three where they will pay dearly for their hubris and Marxism.
I’ve met more people than I can count, both in person and online, who had voted Democrat their entire life, but are now going to vote Republican.
And a stupid new Democratic logo, (which in my opinion looks like the Obama “O” consuming the Democratic Party “D” and removing any reference to the red stripes of the U.S. flag … remiscent of Obama saying that he wouldn’t wear “that flag pin” on his lapel), won’t bring a single one of those voters back to the Democratic Socialist party.
Hey Mr. Pill, this should be right up your alley. Huhuhuhuhuhuh
When one party keeps moving further and further to the left, it skews the perception to make those who are standing their ground and NOT moving, look extreme.
Like Reagan famously said, “I didn’t leave the democrat party, they left me.”
It is the democrats who are extreme in their views and actions, yet they label those who have not moved from their principles as “extremists”.
No Math, that’s right up your alley.
Aaron,
Indeed.
Repeating what I said above, I’ve met more people than I can count, both in person and online, who had voted Democrat their entire life, but are now going to vote Republican.
Correct. What used to be the Democratic Party is now the Democratic Socialist Party. And what used to be the Republican party is now as much or more to the left than the Democratic party of Harry Truman’s day.
The Tea Party is where conservatives of all political backgrounds (Republicans, Libertarians, Independents, and Democrats) have found common ground. And rather than runnning as a third party, the Tea Party has focused on taking back the Republican Party and taking back our country. First by winning Republican primaries, then by winning the general election in November.
Step 1 is done. On to step 2.
P.S. You’ll note that where people have split away from the Republican Party to run as a third party (or worse, to run as a Democrat – Arlen Spector), it has been the “Moderate” Republican who broke off to do so…Crist…Murkowski…
Reagan changed not the Democratic party. Reagan orginally admired FDR and his New Deal policies…now how did the Democratic party change from that again?
That’s great evidence to support the notion that it is the Republican party which is shifting farther to the right rather than the Democrats to the left.
Need I say more?
Math,
I laugh at Democrats circling the drain.
That’s not the same thing as laughing at Beavis and Butthead joking about someone’s (*), as you seem to think is funny.
Math/ChillPill/A Dozen Different Names/,
If a Democrat today said the same thing Harry Truman said 60 years ago, would they be welcome in today’s Democratic Party?
Truman said the most important business in this Nation is raising and training children, at home and educationally (at public schools), with the fundamental Biblical basis of this Nation’s laws. He called that the “proper environment”, and said, “I don’t think we put enough stress on the necessity of implanting in the child’s mind the moral code under which we live.”
I.E., we don’t put enough stress on implanting Biblical truth into children’s minds.
Tell me seriously, would such a truth-speaking Democrat be welcome in today’s Democratic party?
I say no, and point to Zell Miller as a prime example of a Democrat who never left his party, but rather was ostracised by a party that left him.
I never said I thought it was funny. I said I thought you would think it was funny. The huhuhuhuhu is my impression of Butthead. I’m a bit disappointed, I was baiting you for another “they do it so we can do it” kind of rhetoric. You almost fell for it, but not to my satisfaction.
I agree with the notion of giving children the proper environment and implanting in their mind a moral code under which to live their life. I’m not the spokesman for the American l feel you want to make me, so I can’t talk about others, but I would hope most would agree with those very basic concepts.
I disagree with your extrapolation though (“I.E., we don’t put enough stress on implanting Biblical truth into children’s minds.”), as well as your notion that Jesus and the bible have a monopoly on all that is right and moral.
There is a fine line between implanting a moral code in a child, and brainwashing them with fairy tales.
As for your question about Truman, who knows. Things have evolved in the last 60 years. From the outside, it looks like both sides have moved closer to the extremities, so I guess he would fall somewhere in the middle.
Yes. Particularly in light of the paragraphs that follow:
That is a conservative mindset.
Today’s Democratic Socialist Party does not seek equality of opportunity… but rather they seek equality of results.
“Spread the wealth around” is redistribution of wealth… seeking equality of outcomes, not equality of opportunity.
“Fairness”, to a conservative, means equality of opportunity.
“Fairness”, to a “progressive”, means equality of outcomes/results.
Truman was much closer to the conservative mindset than to the progressive mindset.
I, as a conservative, agree with Truman’s speech, including the paragraphs you quote.
Do you, as a progressive, agree with Truman’s speech, including the paragraphs I quoted?
As a progressive, “fairness” does not mean equality of outcomes/results to me. It means everyone has the same opportunities and will achieve based on their merits. Unfortunately, conservative policies tend to diminish equality of opportunity. Does the poor inner city student with straight A’s have the same opportunity to achieve a college education as a C student rich kid? No. Same opportunity to good health care? No. Does a gay person have the same opportunity to marry? Serve in the military? I am not looking for even outcomes…I am looking for a level playing field.
I agree with Truman’s speech as well, even the parts you have highlighted. And I believe most modern day Democrats would as well.
As a conservative, I agree with that definition of “fairness”.
I disagree.
The poor inner city student with straight A’s has a better opportunity to achieve a college education than a C student rich kid.
In fact, the poor inner city student with straight A’s has a better opportunity to achieve a college education than a suburban student with straight A’s. Why? Because there is more competition among the suburban students, and the bar is set higher for them. I know people who work in the admissions offices of “elite” universities, and I know this is true.
Same opportuntity? Yes. Same ability to pay for it? No. But does that mean the government should step in and redistribute the wealth? No. Let’s use an analogy from transportation… Everyone has the same opportunity to buy a Mercedes, but not everyone can afford to pay for a Mercedes. Does that mean the government should step in and redistribute the wealth? No.
Marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Gays have the same opportunity to marry someone of the opposite sex, and some do. But being gay does not give someone the right to change the definition of marriage.
There are good reasons why gays should not serve in certain parts of the military. I could be open to allowing gays to serve openly in some positions, but not others. I’m not going to go into the details of that right now.
I’ll take you at your word on that.
Perhaps most modern day rank-and-file Democrats would agree, but not most of the Democrats currently holding elected office. They give lip-service to being “Christian”, but then are very anti-Christian in their actions.
Mike,
Yesterday you quoted me and said:
Case study: Joe Lieberman
That’s great evidence to support the notion that it is the Democratic party which is shifting farther to the left. Democratic Socialists primaried Joe Lieberman. The Democratic Socialist won the Democratic primary. But that Democratic Socialist was too far left for the total electorate, and Joe Lieberman won the general election.
Now, Arlen Spector knew he was too far left to win the Republican Party primary, so he switched parties. But Democratic voters rejected the turncoat and he lost the Democratic primary. So, who is currently polling better in that PA Senate Race? The Republican….
How about Alaska? Is the Tea Party candidate who won the Republican Primary too far right? Is Murkowski more desirable to the total electorate in the state? No.
So, what’s the take away?
When the Democratic Party moves farther to the left, voters reject the Democrat.
When the Republican Party moves farther to the right, voters embrace the Republican.
The country is saying “NO!” to further moves to the left, and is saying “YES!” to moves to the right.
The pendulum reached it’s maximum movement to the left in early January 2009. Since the Democrats took complete control of 2 of the three branches of our federal government, the pendulum has been moving right, and is still picking up speed.
Oh, and don’t forget Florida. Crist is going to lose as an independent, and Rubio, the Tea Party conservative Republican, is going to win.
You should be careful not to jinx your guy there. Your track record on predictions on this site is not very good.
Naked Emperor News comes through again.
Top 20 Pro-Socialism Sound Bites of Obama, Advisors & Allies
Old Democratic logo: Kicking Ass
New Democratic Logo: Circling the Drain
Oh no the toilet humor again! Too…much…intelligence…head…exploding.
Come on. Even you can do better.
It’s so simple, even Big Bird understands the problem with Washington, D.C. …
Perhaps you’d prefer to recite the “Coffee Party” rap…
So that somehow makes it ok for you to be as dumb as they are?
“The Party Formerly Known As Democrats”
“It’s time to change Washington (D.C.), not America.”