What is the Greatest Threat to our National Security?

The answer is our National Debt.

The Chair of the Joint Chiefs, Admiral Mike Mullen, knows it.

And Obama knows it, too

there has never been a country in the world who saw its economy decline and was able to maintain it’s preeminence militarily

While campaigning, Obama acted like he wanted to reduce this threat by reducing the debt, or at least by reducing the annual deficit, so that the total national debt would grow less quickly.

However, as President, he has more than tripled the deficit, adding significantly to the debt and the threat it poses to our national security.

Click image for Heritage Foundation story

It almost seems intentional, doesn’t it? It almost seems like he’s trying to “bring an Empire to its knees”, doesn’t it? Well, that is his journey, after all. He told us so.

But my journey is part of a larger journey – one shared by all who’ve ever sought to apply the values of their faith to our society. It’s a journey that takes us back to our nation’s founding, when none other than a UCC church inspired the Boston Tea Party and helped bring an Empire to its knees.

Barack Hussein Obama

I guess the majority of Democrats share Obama’s journey to bring this nation to its knees. They don’t even plan on doing a budget this year!



We already know that Obama sees his journey as part of a larger journey – one shared by all who’ve ever sought to apply the values of their faith to our society.  But what is Obama’s faith?  And why does Obama wrongly think the Christians who founded this country were trying to “bring an Empire to its knees“?  The Founding Fathers were not trying to bring the British Empire to its knees. 

What is Barack’s faith? He has never publicly confessed with his mouth “Jesus is Lord”, but he HAS publicly confessed with his mouth the Islamic confession of faith:

Barack Hussein Obama took Shahada

An American Expat in Southeast Asia sounded the alarm way back in August 2007 with this:

When I first saw the recently released Indonesian translation of Barack Obama’s book “The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming The American Dream”, over here in Southeast Asia I was completely taken aback not only by the violent imagery in new title of the book, “Menerjang Harapan: Dari Jakarta Menuju Gedung Putih”, but by the fact that it was not really a translation at all, but rather a completely different title than the original book.

A correct translation of the title of Obama’s book would have been “Keberanian Harapan: Pemikiran Untuk Meraih Kembali Impian America” which translates into “Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming The American Dream”. However, the title for the Indonesian translation of Barack Obama’s book is “Menerjang Harapan: Dari Jakarta Menuju Gedung Putih” which translates into “Assault Hope: From Jakarta to the White House”.

The problem with direct translations is that often times they never make sense. The words “menerjang” (assault or attack) and “harapan” (hope or expectation) make sense when used separately, but used together, the term “menerjang harapan” makes no sense in Indonesian. But while the term makes no sense, it does however present a mental picture to the native Indonesian speaker, the imagery of a “hopeful assault” a “struggle for victory” or to put it more bluntly, a “jihad”, or as the Indonesians see it, Obama’s “jihad” for the Whitehouse. For the native Indonesian speaker, this figurative language creates a mental image whereas the translation of the book’s title can actually come to mean “Jihad: From Jakarta To The Whitehouse”.

Many of Obama’s earliest memories are of growing up in Indonesia, not in the United States. He speaks Bahasa Indonesia. He knows that “his” book was published with a different title, and a different meaning, when it was published in Indonesia, the world’s most populous Muslim nation.

In my opinion, it appears that he is not just an outsider who feels closer ties to Indonesia and Kenya than he does to the U.S.A., he sees the U.S.A. as an “imperialist” “oppressor” of other nations. It appears that he is on a jihad to “fundamentally transform” this country and bring “an Empire to its knees”.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

34 Responses to What is the Greatest Threat to our National Security?

  1. Many of the people who voted for Obama didn’t vote for this kind of CHANGE.

    No, they voted for the kind of CHANGE he promised.

    The CHANGE he has delivered is the exact opposite of the CHANGE he promised:

  2. “yohannesyw” posted the following video on December 26, 2007.

    Clearly, “yohannesyw” believed Barack Obama’s lies…

    So, where’s that “Google for Government” databse?

    So, how about the fact that Obama complained about how much the National Debt increased under George Bush, but Obama is on pace to increase the National Debt more in 4 years than George Bush did in 8!

  3. This gets a bit repetitive, but it’s still worth watching the first part at least:

  4. Ryan says:

    The CHANGE he has delivered is the exact opposite of the CHANGE he promised:

    Well then we have a problem here. The CHANGE he promised was criticized by you as having “no difference at all” to the Communist Party Agenda. Recently you said that the CHANGE he has implmented has “no difference at all” to the Communist Party Agenda.

    Tell me, Mr. Pill, how does one see two opposite things as both being identical to a third?

  5. Sally Hill says:

    I couldn’t agree with you more Pill…I thing he is purposefully bringing us to our knees.

    I have great respect for Thomas Sowell; here is a clip from a recent article of his in the Washington Examiner:

    “Even though some people say we are living in a “knowledge economy,” we are living in a political atmosphere in which ignorance has more power than ever. Washington politicians who have never run any business are telling all kinds of businesses- from automobile companies and banks to hospitals and insurance companies- how they have to run their businesses. This is the golden age of ignorance in power.”

    I think he hit the proverbial nail right on the head.

    I got an email today regarding Obama and the Cloward–Piven strategy, written by a classmate – WAYNE ALLYN ROOT. I believe this is basically what you are describing in this post.

    Barack Obama is no fool. He is not incompetent. To the contrary, he is brilliant. He knows exactly what he’s doing. He is purposely overwhelming the U.S. economy to create systemic failure, economic crisis and social chaos — thereby destroying capitalism and our country from within.

    Barack Obama was my college classmate ( Columbia University , class of ’83). Obama is following the plan of Cloward & Piven, two professors at Columbia University . They outlined a plan to socialize America by overwhelming the system with government spending and entitlement demands. Add up the clues below. Taken individually they’re alarming. Taken as a whole, it is a brilliant, Machiavellian game plan to turn the United States into a socialist/Marxist state with a permanent majority that desperately needs government for survival … and can be counted on to always vote for bigger government. Why not? They have no responsibility to pay for it.

    — Universal health care. The health care bill had very little to do with health care. It had everything to do with unionizing millions of hospital and health care workers, as well as adding 15,000 to 20,000 new IRS agents (who will join government employee unions). Obama doesn’t care that giving free health care to 30 million Americans will add trillions to the national debt. What he does care about is that it cements the dependence of those 30 million voters to Democrats and big government. Who but a socialist revolutionary would pass this reckless spending bill in the middle of a depression?

    — Cap and trade. Like health care legislation having nothing to do with health care, cap and trade has nothing to do with global warming. It has everything to do with redistribution of income, government control of the economy and a criminal payoff to Obama’s biggest contributors. Those powerful and wealthy unions and contributors (like GE, which owns NBC, MSNBC and CNBC) can then be counted on to support everything Obama wants. They will kick-back hundreds of millions of dollars in contributions to Obama and the Democratic Party to keep them in power. The bonus is that all the new taxes on Americans with bigger cars, bigger homes and businesses helps Obama “spread the wealth around.”

    — Make Puerto Rico a state. Why? Who’s asking for a 51st state? Who’s asking for millions of new welfare recipients and government entitlement addicts in the middle of a depression? Certainly not American taxpayers. But this has been Obama’s plan all along. His goal is to add two new Democrat senators, five Democrat congressman and a million loyal Democratic voters who are dependent on big government.

    — Legalize 12 million illegal immigrants. Just giving these 12 million potential new citizens free health care alone could overwhelm the system and bankrupt America . But it adds 12 million reliable new Democrat voters who can be counted on to support big government. Add another few trillion dollars in welfare, aid to dependent children, food stamps, free medical, education, tax credits for the poor, and eventually Social Security.

    — Stimulus and bailouts. Where did all that money go? It went to Democrat contributors, organizations (ACORN), and unions — including billions of dollars to save or create jobs of government employees across the country. It went to save GM and Chrysler so that their employees could keep paying union dues. It went to AIG so that Goldman Sachs could be bailed out (after giving Obama almost $1 million in contributions). A staggering $125 billion went to teachers (thereby protecting their union dues). All those public employees will vote loyally Democrat to protect their bloated salaries and pensions that are bankrupting America . The country goes broke, future generations face a bleak future, but Obama, the Democrat Party, government, and the unions grow more powerful. The ends justify the means.

    — Raise taxes on small business owners, high-income earners, and job creators. Put the entire burden on only the top 20 percent of taxpayers, redistribute the income, punish success, and reward those who did nothing to deserve it (except vote for Obama). Reagan wanted to dramatically cut taxes in order to starve the government. Obama wants to dramatically raise taxes to starve his political opposition.
    With the acts outlined above, Obama and his regime have created a vast and rapidly expanding constituency of voters dependent on big government; a vast privileged class of public employees who work for big government; and a government dedicated to destroying capitalism and installing themselves as socialist rulers by overwhelming the system.

    Add it up and you’ve got the perfect Marxist scheme — all devised by my Columbia University college classmate Barack Obama using the Cloward and Piven Plan.

  6. Ryan,

    Well then we have a problem here. The CHANGE he promised was criticized by you as having “no difference at all” to the Communist Party Agenda.

    Wrong. Please link to where I said the CHANGE he promised had “no difference at all” to the Communist Party Agenda. While I correctly identified Obama as a Communist in early 2008, I never said he openly promised the Communist agenda. There were times where he slipped up and revealed the Communist agenda by mistake (a la looking at raising Capital Gains taxes, even when he knew that that would generate LESS revenue, but doing it for the sake of “fairness”, or the time he slipped up and admitted to Joe the Plumber that he thought it was good when you “spread the wealth around“), but most people didn’t have eyes to see that for what it was. What Obama openly promised was the exact opposite of the Communist agenda. The CHANGE he promised was the Reagan agenda!

    Recently you said that the CHANGE he has implmented has “no difference at all” to the Communist Party Agenda.


    Tell me, Mr. Pill, how does one see two opposite things as both being identical to a third?

    The “two opposite things” are the difference between what Obama promised vs. what Obama has delivered.

    Many people who voted for “CHANGE” wanted a “CHANGE” in the deficit for the better, not a “CHANGE” in the deficit for the worse. Obama correctly identified the debt that was incurred during the Bush years as a problem. Voters believed that Obama “got it”, and that he would DECREASE the deficit. They didn’t understand that Obama “got it”, but he intentionally wanted to SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASE the deficit, for the express reason of bringing our country to CRISIS, and then Communist Normalization.

    Barack Obama and the Strategy of Manufactured Crisis

    Cloward-Piven Government

    (links to the full series here)

  7. Sally,

    Thank you for your comment. Yes, that is exactly what I’m talking about.

  8. And speaking of National Security…

    Article IV Section 4 of the United States Consitution:

    The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

    “Do your job, Mr. President!”

  9. Gallup finds 42% of Americans describing themselves as either very conservative or conservative. This … contrasts with the 20% calling themselves liberal or very liberal.

    Yet those in power, led by Obama, Pelosi, and Reid, are from that less than 20% that are “very liberal”. That minority is driving the rest of us, against our will, down The Road to Socialism USA at top speed.

  10. Widely reviled as a dictator responsible for millions of deaths in political purges, labour camps and forced agricultural collectivisation, Stalin is held up as a hero by supporters who say the Soviet Union would not have defeated Nazi Germany or industrialized without him.

    1) Those who don’t study history are doomed to repeat it. Socialist/Communist leaders always lead to large numbers of deaths in political purges, labour camps and forced agricultural collectivisation. Beware Obama and his “Family Friends” … Ayers advocated the elimination of capitalism, even if it meant the genocide of TWENTY-FIVE MILLION people.

    2) It was the American and British forces, not Soviet forces, that defeated Nazi Germany. Unfortunately, FDR was a progressive, and unwisely let the Soviets occupy portions of Germany… which facilitated the Soviet start of the Cold War.

  11. More people should have paid attention…

  12. Obama fooled people into believing that he would enforce “Pay as you go”, and not increase spending without increasing revenue. The reality is that he has greatly increased spending while revenues have decreased. And history has shown that, contrary to many liberals misconceptions, cutting taxes actually increases tax revenue, while raising taxes actually decreases tax revenue. Now…

    52% Feel Tax Increases Will Hurt the Economy
    The message from voters remains clear: Tax cuts yes, tax hikes no.

    66% See Tax Cuts As Better Way To Create Jobs Than More Government Spending
    Most U.S. voters favor a new government program designed to create jobs but still think ultimately tax cuts and decisions by private business leaders will do more good in terms of job creation.

    46% Expect Tax Hike During Obama Administration
    Forty-six percent (46%) of voters expect their own taxes to go up during the Obama administration. A Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that just 12% expect their taxes to go down.

    Obama fooled many voters into believing they would be getting a tax cut. To the contrary, many of them will be getting tax increases. They realize that now, but they should have paid more attention before the election…

  13. Remember, “Joe the Plumber” told Obama that he was considering buying a business that might make $280,000 a year, and that Obama’s plan would raise the taxes on him if he were to buy that business.

    And remember that Obama told him “but in the years when you made made less than $250,000, you would have gotten a tax cut from me”.

    If you pay taxes, did you really believe you were going to get a tax cut from Obama?

    Under this regime, taxes are only going to go up until there’s practically nothing left to take.

    OBAMANOMICS EXPLAINED: Spreading the Wealth

  14. The reporter was asking all the right questions (one of the very few who actually did so in 2008!!!), but Biden acted like it was a joke. No, it wasn’t a joke, and we see clearly now that the Obama/Biden agenda truly is no different than the agenda of the Communist Party USA. They’ve got the pedal to the metal driving us down The Road to Socialism USA.

  15. David Horowitz and Pat Caddell on Soros´ Shadow Cabinet and the Green Communists

  16. Barack Obama in Kenya supporting Communist, Sharia-supporting Raila Odinga in Kenya:

  17. The banned left-coast commenter previously known as “YouShouldTakeAChillPill”, “none”, and “RedPillIsNotAPatriot” has now tried to return as “Mike” and left a comment saying:

    I love it how Conservatives only seem to worry about the debt during Democrat presidencies.

    I guess he never read some of my posts during the Bush Administration:

    A Huge, Huge Mistake – Among the Biggest of W’s Presidency
    July 28, 2008

    What Should Be Done To “Workout”, not “Bailout”
    September 26, 2008

    Democratic Socialists, President Bush, and Big Money Bailouts
    September 29, 2008

    Nor did he read Michelle Malkin’s posts about “the death of fiscal conservatism” during the Republican Congress and Bush Presidency:

    Big government chart of the day
    By Michelle Malkin • June 22, 2005

    The Mother of All Bailouts = The Death of Fiscal Conservatism
    By Michelle Malkin • September 19, 2008

    Kill the bailout: Phones ringing off the hook; student loans, car debt added to proposal
    By Michelle Malkin • September 23, 2008

    Deficits and the Total Debt have always been a problem. I remember when the Debt hit $1 TRILLION for the first time during the Reagan administration. I didn’t like it then. It’s more than an order of magnitude WORSE now.

    It truly is the greatest threat to our National Security.

    Obama understands that. Obama campaigned saying;

    …there has never been a country in the world who saw its economy decline and was able to maintain it’s preeminence militarily…

    Yet, once in office, rather than work on lowering the deficit, he more than tripled it!

    If that is not intentionally trying to bring this country to its knees, what is?

  18. Debt as percentage of GDP rises to post-WWII high

    The Democrats replaced a free-spending GOP leadership in Congress in 2007, whose final annual federal budget was $2.7 trillion — which had increased over $700 billion in annual federal spending in six years. In the next three years, Democrats made Republicans look like a combination of Ebenezer Scrooge and Silas Marner by adding over a trillion dollars in annual spending in just three years.

    What about the fourth year, for FY2011? Democrats have refused to produce a budget for 2011, so we won’t know … until after the midterms.

  19. skeeter says:

    “What is the Greatest Threat to our National Security? Obama and the Democrat Socialist Party.

  20. Classic Ronald Reagan vs. Present-Day Democrats

  21. Barack sees capitalist Republicans as the evil “empire striking back” against him and other Democratic Socialists.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s