Revolutionary Anti-Imperialists

The Revolutionary Anti-Imperialist Movement is calling on all radicals – anarchists and communists, Mexican and Black nationalists, Third Worldists and Indigenists, students, social critics and anti-racists – to come out and oppose this vile, hateful message in the midst of the Tea Party Movement. Bring signs, bullhorns, props, a hat and sunglasses, etc. Cut loose and let these racist crackers know they are opposed.

A reminder of how Obama views the Boston Tea Party

But my journey is part of a larger journey – one shared by all who’ve ever sought to apply the values of their faith to our society. It’s a journey that takes us back to our nation’s founding, when none other than a UCC church inspired the Boston Tea Party and helped bring an Empire to its knees.

The Boston Tea Party was not about bringing the British Empire to its knees. It was about freedom from tyranny. The Founders wanted the British to leave us alone… they didn’t care what happened to the British “Empire” elsewhere.

Obama tried to paint himself as having something in common with our Founders, but he doesn’t. Instead, he has a lot in common with the Communist revolutionaries of “The Revolutionary Anti-Imperialist Movement”.

In my opinion, it’s pretty obvious that Obama’s agenda and the agenda of “The Revolutionary Anti-Imperialist Movement” are one and the same.

Previously: End of an Empire?


Section 3 of the 14th Amendment:

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Revolutionary Anti-Imperialists

  1. KJ says:

    Would you refer to Britain as an “empire” in the mid-1700s? Perhaps it could be said that Britain was building an empire at that time. I see the powerful British empire as a nineteenth, early twentieth century institution that began when the Brits seized power in India.

  2. Aaron says:

    I don’t know about Mr Red, but I would.

    The British Crown had significant holdings in North America from the late 1600s. Not too long after the founding of the colonies, the British had staked territorial claim to lands all the way to the Mississippi River. (which they lost after the Revolution) The British flag also flew over the Cayman and British Virgin Islands. Though, I don’t know as much about the beginning of British colonial presence in Africa & the Middle East. IIRC, the British stepped in after the decline of the Ottoman Empire. I don’t know when they entered South Asia.

    It was about the late 19th century that the sun began to set on the British Empire. At the close of WWII, it was an empire in name only.

  3. Aaron says:

    That so-called “anarchists” (no government) would ever join with communists (total government) is funny.

    Anarchists are just clueless, rebellious, teenaged, losers that want attention. Communists are the same, even if they’re no longer teenaged. Given those two, maybe their mutual collaboration isn’t so far-fetched after all.

    While we’re on the subject, WTF is a third-worldist? Or an Indigenist? Or an anti-racist?

  4. Trust us, we’ve had long discussions with some of these reporters — many of whom just can’t fathom how anyone out there can NOT support what the current “president” is doing to this country, or just how far Democrats have fallen in the eyes of former party loyalists.

    That’s actually why the RAAACISM! garbage is thrown around so much in the Media, and why everyone in the Tea Party Movement who is revolting against this spendthrift, reckless government is so casually called a RAAACIST! — it’s because the Media has no other way to understand how someone can oppose what’s happening under the “historic and unprecedented first black president” these people have been waiting for their entire adult lives, so therefore this unexplainable (to them) behavior must be rooted in RAAACISM! That’s the only explanation their ivy-league-degreed minds can come up with.

  5. Classic Ronald Reagan vs. Present-Day Democrats

  6. Barack sees capitalist Republicans as the evil “empire striking back” against him and other Democratic Socialists.

  7. Pingback: Who Said “A war is coming” and “the U.S. is going to end soon”? « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)

  8. Pingback: Honey Trail Redux

  9. Check out what Obama said at the 15:19 mark…

    “Revolutionaries, breaking free from an Empire…”

  10. The Obama campaign has scrubbed the original, but there is still this archive (until they scrub that, too!)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s