Do You Remember Watergate?

Thirty-five years ago today, U.S. President Richard M. Nixon submitted his letter of resignation for his role in the scandal.

There was the crime – the break-in, and then there was the cover-up by the Nixon administration.

There were threats, media manipulation and disinformation. It was the cover-up more than the crime itself in the aftermath of the Watergate break-in that led to the downfall of the Nixon administration. It was a critical time for our country, but we survived because of the strength of the U.S. constitution.

Now, we potentially face a new constitutional crisis … not a “fringe” matter, but a core constitutional issue that lies at the very heart of a growing controversy.

…Canada Free Press and the Northeast Intelligence Network have documentation of a cover-up relating to the issue of Obama’s eligibility to hold office. The proof we possess not only exposes a well orchestrated cover-up, but also provides critical insight into why the topic of Obama’s eligibility has failed to gain traction in the corporate media.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Presidential Eligibility. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Do You Remember Watergate?

  1. Math says:

    LOL
    Man you never give up do you? Talk about grasping at straws. One document and the “testimony” of two anonymous sources. Given that all the evidence they have probably comes from one station, the only thing this proves is that there is one station boss that doesn’t want to talk about the birth certificate. Hardly a conspiracy.

  2. “all the evidence they have probably comes from one station”

    I believe what they have came from more than one source, and came long before CNN executives told Lou Dobbs to stop talking about why Obama has not released his birth certificate from the State of Hawaii.

    As much as CNN would like the following to be true, it is not true:

    [I]t seems this story is dead — because anyone who is not convinced doesn’t really have a legitimate beef.

    The original birth certificate cannot prove Obama is eligible.
    It can only prove that he is ineligible.

    If Obama was born in Hawaii, the 14th Amendment makes him a U.S. Citizen (sufficient to be a Senator), but it does not make him a natural born citizen (required to be President). See the doubts expressed by the U.S. Supreme Court in their 1875 decision in the case of Minor v Happersett:

    “The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens.”

    In the words of the United States Supreme Court, to be undoubtedly a natural born citizen of the United States, it is necessary to be born in the country of parents who were its citizens.

    NBC = 1, 2, 3.

    NBC (Natural Born Citizen) =
    1) Born in the U.S.
    2) Father was a U.S. citizen at time of child’s birth
    3) Mother was a U.S. citizen at time of child’s birth

    My first “beef” is that Obama’s own campaign web site openly admitted that he fails #2. His father was never a U.S. citizen, and Obama was born a British subject. That is 100% fact, and is undisputed.

    My second “beef” is that Obama has never released any document directly from the State of Hawaii to even prove #1. And the State of Hawaii, when asked, refused to verify the authenticity of the COLB produced at and by the Obama campaign headquarters.

  3. Math says:

    So why do you need the birth certificate if, in your opinion (and in reality), it is already 100% established in fact that his father is Kenyan?

    Do you think that the Supremes will just go “Oh a birth certificate, lets declare him ineligible just based on that single piece of new evidence that provides no new fact that were not already 100% established”. They had multiple chance to take cases disputing his eligibility. They turned down every single one of them. This will not magically change if his BC is ever made public.

  4. Harry H says:

    I’m no lawyer, but I understood that one Justice, just-retired Souter, canned Leo Donofrio’s application for a hearing. How that works I don’t know, but it seems misleading to say “they”–meaning the whole Supreme Court, studied the case and refused to hear it.

    In any case, it is clear that a large number of citizens have serious and legitimate questions about the lawful authority held by Obama. It is clear Obama has fought hard against disclosing the full truth about his birth status. And it is clear that our government, as well as the media, is fighting hard to avoid addressing the widespread concerns of the citizenry. Now why would that be if nothing is amiss here?

  5. Math says:

    The way it works is each justice is assigned a federal court district and filters the appeals coming from it. That is the agreed procedure, and he did so acting in the name of the entire Supreme court. So yeah, the Supreme court refused to hear the case.

  6. Worse than Watergate, indeed…

    it could be the biggest political fraud in the history of the world… The first step toward resolving the issue is full discovery and disclosure of the facts.

  7. As to Dr. Fukino’s first News Release….

    So, now we have our answer. We know whether or not “Date Filed by Registrar” matters. It matters. A lot. Because Dr. Fukino said that the “original birth certificate” was in the “Registrar’s” custody. It was still in the procedural stage. And because someone other than the Hawaii State Registrar was custodian of Obama’s original birth certificate on October 31, 2008, we know that Obama did not have a valid original birth certificate and he possibly had an application for a ‘Late Birth Certificate’ on file that was pending acceptance by the State Registrar….

    And if it was not in the State Registrar’s custody and under his authority, then his “original birth certificate” was not evidence to “date and place of birth and parentage.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s