Associated Press Distorts Again

WASHINGTON – Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy has rejected two more efforts to get the court to consider whether President-elect Barack Obama is eligible to take office.

Kennedy on Wednesday denied without comment an appeal by Philip J. Berg, a Pennsylvania attorney, that claims Obama is either a citizen of Kenya or Indonesia and is ineligible to be president because he is not a “natural-born citizen” of the U.S. as required by the Constitution. Another appeal from California, based on Berg’s claims, also was denied.

Individual justices and the entire court have turned down emergency appeals over Obama’s eligibility at least seven times in the past six weeks.

Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961 to an American mother and a Kenyan father.

Reacting to Internet-fueled conspiracy theories that Obama’s birth certificate is a fake, Hawaiian officials have said they examined the document and have no doubt it is authentic.

The AP is not telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.  Each of the statements in bold above is deceiptful.

The AP did not tell you that ONLY applications for stays have been denied, while certiorari has NOT been denied. 

The AP did not tell you that on the same day that Kennedy denied the stay in Berg’s case, he also distributed that case to the whole court for conference on January 9, 2009.  The AP’s claim that Kennedy “rejected two more efforts to get the court to consider” is patently false.  When a case is distributed for conference, the court is considering the case!

The AP did not tell you that two other cases have already been distributed for conference (Donofrio on Dec. 5, Wrotnowski on Dec. 12).  That means that the Supreme Court is now considering three different cases.

I believe that the Supreme Court is giving the Legislative Branch a chance to do their job, uphold their oath, and refuse to certify Barack Hussein Obama because he fails to qualify for the office of President of the United States.  I believe that if the Legislative Branch does NOT do their job, then the Judicial Branch will have to step in at that time.

The AP did not tell you that there are two different “Birth” documents.  The AP did not tell you that there is a difference between Obama’s “CertificatION of Live Birth” (which has a lot in common with the COLB of “Hey! I Be A Forgery“) and his “original vault Birth CertificatE“.

The AP deceived you when they said, “Hawaiian officials have said they examined the document and have no doubt it is authentic.”

The Hawaiian officials have not vouched for the authenticity of the forged COLB. 

Parse the Statement by Dr. Fukino about Barack Hussein Obama’s Official Birth Certificate

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Presidential Eligibility. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Associated Press Distorts Again

  1. Ryan says:

    You think the Supreme Court of the United States is aware of an unprecedented fraud involving the president-elect, but decided to give someone else a chance to deal with it first? What are you smoking?

  2. Ted says:

    EASY WAY TO MAKE SURE OBAMA NEVER GETS INAUGURATED (READ CAREFULLY):–

    Since the Supreme Court has now prevented itself from acknowledging the question of whether Barack H. Obama is or is not an Article II “natural born citizen” based on the Kenyan/British citizenship of Barack Obama’s father at the time of his birth (irrespective of whether Barack Obama is deemed a “citizen” born in Hawaii or otherwise) as a prerequisite to qualifying to serve as President of the United States under the Constitution — the Court having done so three times and counting, first before the Nov 4 general election and twice before the Dec 15 vote of the College of Electors — it would seem appropriate, if not necessary, for all Executive Branch departments and agencies to secure advance formal advice from the United States Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States” as to whether they are governed by laws, regulations, orders and directives issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees, by the weight of existing legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II “natural born citizen”.

  3. Cicero kid says:

    AP – “Ahhh Plllease!

    Having been in advertising for some years now and I learned that 80% of news is planted. Very little investigative journalism out there anymore.

    My Filipina wife is getting a good lesson on American history and government throughout all of the ection proccess…and knows that Obie-Wan is currently unemployed and will not, can not be called president -elect until January…

    Your blog has been very thought provoking and has spurred me into researching much here lately. Keep up the good work!

  4. Curious says:

    May I ask why, when and where u where inspired by The Red Pill? Was it your idea? Or somone inspire you outside of the movie itself?

    Oracle(chuckles, just because your going to ask next…)

  5. Ryan,

    I believe the SCOTUS is respecting the 20th Amendment, which specifies what the Legislative Branch is to in this situation. If the Legislative Branch fails to keep their oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States, then the Judicial Branch will do so. I believe they will have the four votes necessary to grant Certiorari, but I do not know if they will get the necessary fifth vote.

    A Constitutional crisis, and Obama has only himself to blame.

  6. Ted,

    Thank you for your comment. Very thought provoking. And part of the reason why I believe that the SCOTUS will be forced to rule on “natural born citizen” if the Legislative Branch confirms the Electoral College vote for Obama.

    Colero alone shines a spotlight on the failure of Secretaries of State to properly vet candidates for President of the United States.

    RULE OF LAW.

    Not the rule of the ObamaMedia, George Soros, corrupt government officials, etc.

  7. Cicero kid,

    Thank you for your comment and kind words.

    I’m not a full-time blogger, but I am passionate about God, family, and country. This could be our last free election if we let an unqualified candidate, with strong ties to both Marxist/Leninists and radical Muslims, usurp the Presidency of the United States and Commander-in-Chief of our Armed Forces.

  8. Curious,

    Thanks for your comment.

    My “About” page explains the name.

  9. Pingback: AP Puts More Trust in Obama Rumors Than in Facts « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)

  10. Is the Associated Press an unbiased, trustworthy news organization?

    Would they distort the truth in order to gain a political advantage?

    Well, check out this example:

    The AP photographer who sent the caption would have known that it was …, but by not mentioning her the AP was able to do a media hit on … but still be able to claim they told the “truth” with the caption.

  11. Could H. RES. 593 be used as “prima facie” evidence by the State of Hawaii to issue Dr. Fukino’s second News Release and finally make the claim “Obama was born in Hawaii”?

    I think the answer is yes, based on

    Federal Rules of Evidence
    Rule 902. Self-authentication

    (10) Presumptions under Acts of Congress. Any signature, document, or other matter declared by Act of Congress to be presumptively or prima facie genuine or authentic.

    I guess it depends on whether a “Resolution” is considered an “Act” of Congress. If “Acts of Congress” are limited to actual bills that pass both houses and are signed by the President to become an official Act, then no. But if a simple “Resolution” of a single chamber of Congress is considered an “Act of Congress”, then yes.

    Members of Congress never inspected any original, initial vital record to verify the “Obama birth narrative”. They neglected their responsibilities under Section 3 of the 20th Amendment. They effectively “outsourced” those responsibilities to an unelected, unaccountable third party that has connections to Obama (via Annenberg). They Assumed that the fraudulent COLB which was shown to a small, select, controlled audience from Annenberg Political Fact Check was actually authentic.

    Members of Congress voted in favor of H.Res. 593 with the assumption that the COLB was authentic, and never realized that they were being played… they themselves were unknowingly becoming the ” prima facie” evidence that Obama was born in Hawaii.

    Did the State of Hawaii make the claim that “Obama was born in Hawaii” base on H.Res. 593 and not based on any hospital record of Obama’s birth in Hawaii? I think so.

    But now that Neil Abercrombie has become Governor, I have little doubt that new documents will be manufactured in Hawaii. Time is short for members of Congress to demand to see the original, initial vital records, released directly to them under seal by the State of Hawaii.

  12. As to Dr. Fukino’s first News Release….

    So, now we have our answer. We know whether or not “Date Filed by Registrar” matters. It matters. A lot. Because Dr. Fukino said that the “original birth certificate” was in the “Registrar’s” custody. It was still in the procedural stage. And because someone other than the Hawaii State Registrar was custodian of Obama’s original birth certificate on October 31, 2008, we know that Obama did not have a valid original birth certificate and he possibly had an application for a ‘Late Birth Certificate’ on file that was pending acceptance by the State Registrar….

    And if it was not in the State Registrar’s custody and under his authority, then his “original birth certificate” was not evidence to “date and place of birth and parentage.”

  13. As to Dr. Fukino’s second News Release….

    Which came first, the chicken or the egg?

    There were just under 5 hours between the chicken (H.Res.593)
    and the egg (Dr. Fukino’s second News Release).

    On July 27, 2009, the vote on House Resolution 593 came at 6:55pm EDT (12:55pm HST).

    And on that same day, Dr. Fukino’s second News Release was first made public in a PDF attachment in an email sent to MissTickly at 11:45pm EDT (5:45pm HST).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s