Is THIS Question “Above Obama’s Pay Grade”?

DNA evidence is often used in court cases as a means of determining unique identity.  If the defendant’s DNA is found at a crime scene, the defendant is usually found guilty (unless they are O. J. Simpson, but that’s another topic).

Question: When was your unique DNA established?

Answer: At conception.

Would Barack Obama (a.k.a. Barry Soetoro) answer that question, or would he say that it’s, “above my pay grade“?

Update: Pro-Life Question for John McCain

UPDATE: Michelle Malkin has an excellent Pro-Life post entitled DNC Dispatch: The Planned Parenthood protest

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Is THIS Question “Above Obama’s Pay Grade”?

  1. Kirk W. says:

    Exactly. That’s the best argument I’ve seen so far. There’s no doubt in my mind that this response will come back to haunt Barry.

    John McCain had a great night and it should (hopefully) bolster his support from evangelicals. Now we know why Obama has been dodging McCain on doing townhall meetings, because McCain would run circles around him!

  2. Kirk,
    Thank you for your comment. I appreciate your kind words.

    The question of when life begins is really not a difficult question. From either a purely scientific perspective (DNA) or a Biblical perspective (God formed you in your mother’s womb) the answer is the same:

    Life begins at conception.

    It is only the people who deny that truth who have a hard time answering the question, because there is no other logical answer.

  3. More than a decade ago, a Supreme Court decision literally wiped off the books of fifty states statutes protecting the rights of unborn children. Abortion on demand now takes the lives of up to one and a half million unborn children a year. Human life legislation ending this tragedy will someday pass the Congress, and you and I must never rest until it does. Unless and until it can be proven that the unborn child is not a living entity, then its right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness must be protected.

    You may remember that when abortion on demand began, many, and indeed, I’m sure many of you, warned that the practice would lead to a decline in respect for human life, that the philosophical premises used to justify abortion on demand would ultimately be used to justify other attacks on the sacredness of human life — infanticide or mercy killing. Tragically enough, those warnings proved all too true. Only last year a court permitted the death by starvation of a handicapped infant.

    President Ronald Reagan
    Remarks at the Annual Convention of the the National Association of Evangelicals
    March 8, 1983

    Reagan was pro-life. McCain is pro-life.
    Obama’s vote in IL supported infanticide.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s