Go Ahead, Call Us Crazy

Supporting and defending the Constitution and the Rule of Law
makes one a “Constitutional Republican”, not a “birther”.

When one combines the legal requirements of:

1) Article II Section 1 of the United States Constitution

2) Section 3 of the 20th Amendment to the United States Constitution

3) The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986:

All employees, citizens and noncitizens, hired after November 6, 1986 and working in the United States must complete a Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification.

… one sees that Obama and Biden are legally required to produce hard copy documentation of not only their eligibility to work in the United states but also their eligibility to hold the office of President.

And Congress has the legal responsibility to ensure that the President and Vice President have qualified.

A Constitutional Republican expects those who swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution and the Rule of Law to ACTUALLY DO SO.

Go ahead, call us crazy.

I say it’s crazy that not a single member of Congress ever inspected a hard copy birth certificate for the pResident and Vice-President.

I say it’s crazy that not a single member of Congress ever questioned whether a son who admitted he was born a British subject because his father was a British subject (and never a U.S. citizen) can be considered a “natural born citizen” of the United States.

I say it’s crazy that the Senate debated whether or not John McCain is a “natural born citizen” of the United States, but they were too timid to debate the same issue with respect to Barry Soetoro (a.k.a Barack Obama).

I say it’s crazy to think that this issue will go away if you continue to mock and label Constitutional Republicans as “birthers”.

President Ronald Reagan was famous for saying:

Trust, but verify

If you mock verification, you are mocking Ronald Reagan.

About these ads
This entry was posted in Presidential Eligibility. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Go Ahead, Call Us Crazy

  1. Donald Trump’s long-form Birth Certificate:
    JPG, PDF.

    Next question:
    Since Trump’s mother was born in Scotland, did she become a naturalized U.S. citizen before her son Donald was born?

    If yes, then Trump was born on U.S. soil to two U.S. citizen parents, and he is a natural born citizen of the United States.

    If no, then Trump was born on U.S. soil to a U.S. citizen father and a British subject mother, and was therefore both a U.S. citizen at birth and a British subject at Birth, but not a natural born U.S. citizen.

    If Trump’s mother became a naturalized U.S. citizen before his birth, then he eligible to hold the office of President and Commander-in-Chief.
    If not, then Trump is just as ineligible as Soetoro (a.k.a. Obama).

    Exit question: Is is racist of me to say that?
    (/sarc)

  2. Donald Trump
    born June 14, 1946 in Queens, New York, NY (Meets the Jus Soli Requirement)

    Parents were
    Frederick Christ Trump, born October 11, 1905 in Queens, NY, died June 1999 in Queens, NY
    Mary Ann MacLeod, born May 10, 1912 in SCOTLAND, died August 7, 2000 in Queens, NY. Arrived in US October 5, 1935. Married January 1936. Naturalized as a US Citizen March 10, 1942.

    Both parents were US Citizens at the time of his birth (Meets the Jus Sanguinis Requirement)

    Donald Trump is a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN unlike Comrade Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama.

    24 posted at Free Republic on Tuesday, March 29, 2011 11:16:15 PM by ASA Vet (Natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. De Vattel)

  3. “Patriot Dreamer” at The Conservative Treehouse blog pointed me to this…

    Research by FReeper “ASA Vet” shows that Trump’s mother was a naturalized U.S. citizen before The Donald was born:

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2696762/posts?page=24#24

    We need to verify that research, but initially it looks good.

    As long as that proves true (that his mother became a Naturalized US Citizen March 10, 1942, long before she gave birth to Donald on June 14, 1946 in Queens, New York, NY), then Trump is therefore in the PERFECT position to challenge Soetoro/Obama on this issue!!!

  4. What you won’t hear from this campaign or this party is the kind of politics that uses religion as a wedge, and patriotism as a bludgeon — that sees our opponents not as competitors to challenge, but enemies to demonize.”

    Barack Obama, June 3, 2008

    “I always use the word extreme,
    that’s what the caucus instructed me to do…”

    - Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer, Tuesday March 29, 2011

  5. ABC News:

    Despite Obama’s public professions on religion and spirituality, many Americans continue to doubt the president’s faith.

    Nearly one in five Americans incorrectly believes that Obama is a Muslim, according to a poll by the nonpartisan Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life released late last year.

    The poll found the number surveyed who knew correctly that Obama is Christian actually declined, from 48 percent in March 2009 to 34 percent in August 2010. Forty-three percent of Americans now say they don’t know what Obama’s religion is at all.

    Obama has never publicly confessed what is described in Romans 10:9-10. Obama has never publicly confessed, “Jesus Christ is Lord, and I believe in my heart that God has raised Him from the dead”.

    Obama has publicly confessed the Islamic confession of faith, the Shahada, which are the opening lines of the call to prayer. He did so in Arabic. A single honest recitation of the Shahada in Arabic is all that is required for a person to become a Muslim.

    So, by the confessions of Obama’s own mouth, we have more reason to believe that he is a Muslim than a Christian.

    Obama knows what publicly confessing the Shahada in Arabic means to the Muslim world. When will ABC News ask Obama why he did so?

    When will ABC News ask Obama why he

    publicly confessed the Islamic confession of faith in Arabic

    knowing that the Muslim world would interpret it as an indication that he is a Muslim?

  6. Hat Tip: Bridgette on 2011/03/31 at 1:03 am

    Trump’s mother did become a U.S. citizen before the birth of Donald. Below is a signed naturalization receipt for Mrs. Trump on March 10, 1942, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, four years before Donald was born. WND found a larger image of the document in the National Archives, showing details for Mary Anne Trump, including her home address of 175 24 Devonshire Rd. in Jamaica, N.Y. and her age of 29 at the time of the record.

    http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=281157

    Trumps Mother’s Naturalization Card

  7. The challenge for journalists today is to somehow get the “birther” issue into their copy (because it generates a ton of hits) without alienating the good opinion of their colleagues, all of whom in New York-Washington media circles are resolute in their belief that “birthers” are insane.

    So, the Journ-O-listers in New York-Washington media circles are resolute in their belief that “birthers” are insane!

    Go ahead, call us crazy.

  8. Repeating what I said in the post above…

    I say it’s crazy that not a single member of Congress ever inspected a hard copy birth certificate for the pResident and Vice-President.

    I say it’s crazy that not a single member of Congress ever questioned whether a son who admitted he was born a British subject because his father was a British subject (and never a U.S. citizen) can be considered a “natural born citizen” of the United States.

    I say it’s crazy that the Senate debated whether or not John McCain is a “natural born citizen” of the United States, but they were too timid to debate the same issue with respect to Barry Soetoro (a.k.a Barack Obama).

    I say it’s crazy for them to think that this issue will go away if they continue to mock and label Constitutional Republicans as “birthers”.

    President Ronald Reagan was famous for saying:

    Trust, but verify

    If one mocks verification, then they are mocking Ronald Reagan.

  9. On 2011/05/25 at 2:39 pm, Justine said:

    You are certifiably insane.

    No, comrade, I’m not.

    Political abuse of psychiatry is the misuse of psychiatric diagnosis, detention and treatment for the purposes of obstructing the fundamental human rights of certain groups and individuals in a society.[3][9]:491 Many authors including psychiatrists use the terms ‘Soviet political psychiatry’[11][12][13]:179[14]:395[15]:205 and ‘punitive psychiatry’ instead.[16][17][18][19]:60, 77[20]:243, 252[21]:72[22]:148[23]:10, 57, 136[24]:92, 95, 98[25]:292, 293, 294[26]:226[27]:258

    Psychiatric confinement of sane people is uniformly considered a particularly pernicious form of repression[2] and Soviet punitive psychiatry was one of the key weapons of both illegal and legal repression.[26]:226 Soviet psychiatric hospitals were used by the authorities as prisons in order to isolate hundreds or thousands of political prisoners from the rest of society, discredit their ideas, and break them physically and mentally.[28] This method was also employed against religious prisoners, including especially well-educated former atheists who adopted a religion; in such cases their religious faith was determined to be a form of mental illness that needed to be cured.[29]

    As much as you would like to misuse and abuse a psychiatric diagnosis in order to shut me up and put me away, we still live in a country that was Founded on the belief that:

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

    I am not “certifiably insane”. Far from it. I think much like our Founders thought. And my mind is sound.

    For God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of power and of love and of a sound mind.

    Timothy 1:7

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s