TODAY IS A BIG DAY AT THE U.S. SUPREME COURT!!!
| No. 10-446 |
|
| Title: |
| Charles Kerchner, Jr., et al., Petitioners |
| v. |
| Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al. |
|
| Docketed: |
October 4, 2010 |
| Lower Ct: |
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit |
| Case Nos.: |
(09-4209) |
| Decision Date: |
July 2, 2010 |
| ~~~Date~~~ |
~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| Sep 30 2010 |
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 3, 2010) |
| Nov 3 2010 |
Waiver of right of respondents Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al. to respond filed. |
| Nov 3 2010 |
Brief amicus curiae of Western Center for Journalism filed. (Distributed) |
| Nov 8 2010 |
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 23, 2010. |
|
Like this:
Be the first to like this post.
This entry was posted on November 23, 2010 at 12:23 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
January 27, 2011 at 1:53 pm
No. 10-678
Title: Gregory S. Hollister, Petitioner
v.
Barry Soetoro, et al.
Docketed: November 23, 2010
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Case Nos.: (09-5080)
Decision Date: March 22, 2010
Rehearing Denied: August 23, 2010
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nov 22 2010 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 23, 2010)
Nov 22 2010 Appendix of Gregory S. Hollister filed. (Volumes I, II, III)
Dec 22 2010 Waiver of right of respondents Barry Soetoro, et al. to respond filed.
Dec 29 2010 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 14, 2011.
Dec 30 2010 Request for recusal received from petitioner.
Jan 18 2011 Petition DENIED.
—————–
Lawyers say Supremes broke rule, failed to respond to recusal motion
March 3, 2011 at 3:53 pm
The U.S. Supreme Court has an opportunity to grant certiorari on THAT QUESTION tomorrow, March 4, 2011.
Will they?
I don’t know. But I think it is worth following the example of our Founders of fasting and praying for the next 24 hours.
March 7, 2011 at 12:46 pm
The usurpation continues unchecked, as the Supreme Court is in full “see no evil” and/or “ostrich with its head in the sand” and/or “unindicted co-conspirators” mode…
It is clear from today’s order list that Sotomayor and Kagan did not recuse themselves!
Compare what is said about other cases, like this:
To the Soetoro case:
And another case:
It is clear that Sotomayor and Kagan did not recuse themselves in the Sotoro case, even though they have a very clear conflict of interest, and a petition asking for them to recuse themselves was NOT responded to by the court in the prescribed time, so by the Court’s own rules, that request should have been granted and Sotomayor and Kagan should have recused themselves.
It really is a travesty that they did not, and that the court has turned a blind eye to the Soetoro usurpation.
March 7, 2011 at 1:25 pm