Hawaii Sent Two Certificates to Congress, Won’t Send the Third

The State of Hawaii sent this certificate and this certificate under seal directly to Congress, but refuses to send them this certificate.

Who is the employer of the President of the United States?

Isn’t it “We the People”?

Don’t “We the People”, as the President’s employer, have not only a right but a LEGAL OBLIGATION to inspect the documents required by the Immigration Reform and Control Act?

You betcha.

About these ads
This entry was posted in Presidential Eligibility. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Hawaii Sent Two Certificates to Congress, Won’t Send the Third

  1. skeeter says:

    Short answer, No. We are not the employer of the president. Soros himself said “I have bought and paid for the democrat(ic) Party”. Obama is answerable to his employer who happens to be a socialist. Believe it or not the American people have a president who is owned and controlled by an Elite Global entity.

  2. ladysforest says:

    You got that right skeeter. I found it very telling recently when Soros was so let down by obama. He sounded like he was talking about his own child being a disappointment. Chilling.

    To think that this IS happening in America…..

    The thing that has begun to worry me a great deal is that many people who are very much in opposition of this government have adopted an attitude that we can just wait it all out, and count on voting obama out next time around. That all of these bad things will go away then and it will all be alright again.

    This is where our real danger hides now. The belief that America can withstand this and will magically be handed back to us fundamentally unchanged.

  3. Pingback: Which Government Organization Was The First To Say, “Obama was born in Hawaii”? « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)

  4. Pingback: Michelle Obama, Birther « I Took The Red Pill (and escaped the Matrix)

  5. It has been advanced that both papers printed identical lists as the general rule. As I mentioned before, this was pointed out to add more “weight” to the (ahem) proof these newspaper birth announcements lend to obama’s birth story… So I pulled a sample size of ten days from each paper. I began the splendidly tedious process of comparing the incidence of the same birth announcements being listed in both papers. Mainly with an eye towards how often they matched in exact order.The only time this occurred in that particular way within the ten days that I researched, was on the dates that had obama’s birth announcements.

    And I even took the extra steps of comparing editions to a three day range (edition before, same date, edition after) of the sister publication. So, I tried to cover all the bases in a fair comparison.

    Well, OK. The ONE and ONLY time that the two papers published the birth list, beginning at the first announcement, in order, was in the editions that obama’s birth announcement appeared. This was indeed the only time that these announcements were printed this way, as the closest the papers came to doing this again never had all the same names listed in the exact same order. I figured the ten day sample would give conclusive data as to if this was uncommon.

    That wasn’t the only anomaly she found… follow the link for more.

  6. Thank you, MissTickly, I appreciate that a lot.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s