Death of Democratic Party: One-Year Anniversary

A year ago the Democratic National Committee’s Rules & Bylaws Committee decided that Barack Obama would get free delegates from Michigan, including 4 that Hillary earned, even though Obama had voluntarily removed his name from the primary election ballot for calculated strategic reasons (to win more support in Iowa).

From one of the commenters…

This day marked the beginning of a revolution… We had made a break from the Democratic party we were no longer their faithful servants! It was like we all suddenly got Spring fever and yelled “to hell with the Democrats!”

Corruption in both the Democratic and Republican parties led to ineligible men winning their party’s nomination for President.

I’ve written several posts before about the corruption that led to McCain winning the Republican primary and then losing the general election.

Slowly but surely, “We the People” are waking up to what has been happening in this country over the last 100 years. “We the People” are waking up to the foreign influences behind the Federal Reserve and many of our politicians. “We the People” are once again standing up for freedom from tyrants. That is what the Tea Parties are all about.

FEDucation for All

FEDucation for All

Racism Is Unacceptable, Period.

Imagine two white supremacists, one with a night stick, in front of a voting precinct, and one of them says to a black observer,

“You are about to be ruled by the white man, nigger.”

And then McCain wins the election and has his DOJ drop the already won case against these white supremacists.

How do you think that would go down?

The reality is that this situation is NO DIFFERENT.

It’s only the skin color that has been reversed.

So, who are the racists?  Who are the haters?

“You are about to be ruled by the black man, cracker.”

Racism by dark skinned people against light skinned people is no better than racism by light skinned people against dark skinned people.

Racism Is unacceptable, period.  It cannot be tolerated in any form.

But the most racist President of the last 100 years, a man who uses racism in order to form a more Socialist Union, not only tolerates this behavior, but rewards it.

Doomsday Checkpoint

“Algore says we have ten years left to save the planet from a scorching.
Okay, we’re going to start counting.
We will begin the count, ladies and gentlemen.”

Rush Limbaugh
January 27, 2006

Today marks the point where we are one-third (1/3) of the way through those 10 years.

If Al Gore’s “Inconvenient Truth” were really true, and we are significantly along that path to scorching, shouldn’t we be seeing some significant temperature increases by this point?

Our climate is not driven by CO2. But it is affected by the number of solar flares, which are currently at a minimum. The Earth is actually cooling very slightly, not warming.

Al Gore’s “Inconvenient Truth” is anything but the truth. It is a convenient lie, being foisted by Democratic Socialist Communists who are trying to destroy Capitalism and replace it with Socialism first, then Communism.

You don’t think the “green” movement is anti-capitalist? Even people who think “the BEST film [they] have ever seen” is the Apocalyptic fiction film “The Age of Stupid” recognize that it is anti-capitalist…

Quite honestly the BEST film i have ever seen.
Certainly not unnecessarily anti – capitalist but it is an inescapable truth that the way of life to date of much of the west (ie. that of a capitalist society) is largely responsible for the mess we are in.

Another commenter has this to say:

Kate said…
Posted on Mar 21 2009 08:29
The scare over global warming has been deliberately stoked up for political reasons and has long since parted company with proper scientific evidence.
Nothing has more acutely demonstrated this than the reliance of the IPCC on computer models to predict what is going to happen to global temperatures over the next 100 years. On these predictions, that temperatures are likely to rise by up to 5.3ºC, all their other predictions and recommendations depend, yet nearly 10 years into the 21st century it is already painfully clear that the computer forecasts are going hopelessly astray. Far from rising with CO2, as the models are programmed to predict they should, the satellite-measured temperature curve has flattened out and then dropped. If the present trend were to continue, the world in 2100 would not in fact be hotter but 1.1ºC cooler than the 1979-1998 average.
Yet it is on this fundamental inability of the computer models to predict what has already happened that all else hangs. Recently in New York for two days distinguished experts, such as Professor Syun-Ichi Akasofu, former director of the International Arctic Research Center, Dr Willie Soon of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics and Professor Paul Reiter of the Pasteur Institute, authoritatively (and often wittily) tore apart one piece of the scare orthodoxy after another.
Sea levels are not shooting up but only continuing their modest 3mm a year rise over the past 200 years. The vast Antarctic ice-sheet is not melting, except in one tiny corner, the Antarctic Peninsula. Tropical hurricane activity, far from increasing, is at its lowest level for 30 years. The best correlation for temperature fluctuations is not CO2 but the magnetic activity of the sun. For an admirable summary of proceedings by the Australian paleoclimatologist Professor Bob Carter, Google “Heartland” and “Quadrant”.

Update: The masks slips for global-warming activists

The entire point of the global movement to arrest energy production is to punish the industrial nations for their wealth. This is just redistributionism writ large. They don’t want to limit carbon emissions per se; they just want the right people to emit carbon. Nations like the US, the UK, and other Western nations would have to be out of their minds to agree to a regime that allows China and India to emit far more carbon per capita than themselves, in order to meet some Utopian ideal of “fairness” in economic success.

—

UPDATE:
Meltdown of the climate ‘consensus’

Focusing on the Solution

I have decided to focus on the solution (which is progressing very well), rather than focus on the problem (our out-of-control Socialist/Communist government).

Consider This…

Obama’s grandmother said she was present at the birth [in Kenya] of her grandson Barack. The Kenyan government then put a gag order on Obama’s family.

The day after the election, the Kenyan ambassador to the U.S. admitted that Barack’s Kenyan birth is “well known in Kenya”.

The day after the election, the Kenyan National Assemby said:

…the President-elect, Mr. Obama, is a son of the soil of this country…

…the people of the United States of America have just had a historic election where the son of this soil, Barrack Hussein Obama, has been elected the 44th President of the United States of America…

…we are the home of the President-elect of the USA…

The Kenyan National Assemby later scrubbed that record from their web site.

The only “birth document” that the Obama campaign ever produced was pronounced a forgery by document experts, and never “validated” by the state of Hawaii.

No official birth document for Barack Obama has ever been released by the state of Hawaii.

Hawaiian officials have never put out an official statement saying that Obama was born in Hawaii.

In each of the 50 states, the Secretary of State took Nancy Pelosi’s word (!) that Barack Obama was legally qualified under the Constitution of the United States to hold the office of President and Commander-in-Chief.

The Associated Press lied.

Annenberg Political Fact Check lied.

Members of Congress “outsourced” the responsibility of validating Soetoro/Obama’s eligibility, and accepted the lies told by the Associated Press and Annenberg Political Fact Check.

Google Obama Annenberg.

Barack Obama has significant connections to Annenberg.

The COLB was produced at the Obama campaign offices, not released by the State of Hawaii.

The State of Hawaii never verified the COLB.

The only group that was allowed to examine the paper COLB was Annenberg Political Fact Check.

Annenberg Political Fact Check proceeded to make two demonstrably false statements.

Senators and Representatives “outsourced” the verification of Obama’s birth certificate, by accepting Annenberg Political Fact Check’s lies as truth.

Here is the actual text of a letter I received from one of my Senators:

Thank you for contacting me about President-Elect Barack Obama’s citizenship. I appreciate knowing your concerns.

The Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.” Hawaii became a territory of the United States in 1898 and was officially admitted as a State in 1959.

It is my understanding that President-Elect Obama has released an official copy of his birth certificate. Since he was born in 1961 in Hawaii, he is eligible under the Constitution to run for and hold the office of President of the United States. In addition, President-Elect Obama’s birth records have been certified and validated by the Hawaii Department of Health as well as by experts from the University of Pennsylvania. The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the case and agreed with the lower courts’ rulings that the plaintiffs lacked standing to bring the legal challenges questioning President-Elect Obama’s citizenship.

Again, thank you for contacting me. Should you have any additional questions or comments, please do not hesitate to let me know or visit my website at …

The “experts from the University of Pennsylvania” were Annenberg Political Fact Check.

Obama has never authorized the release of an official copy of his birth certificate.

Obama’s birth location has been NEVER been “certified” or “validated” by the Hawaii Department of Health.

Congress examined official, certified documents from the Secretary of State from each of the 50 states. Those were the certifications of the Electoral College vote.

Is it too much to ask for our Congress to examine one more certificate… the officially certified birth certificate of the man who wants to be President and Commander-in-Chief?

Lastly, the 14th amendment defines citizenship, not “natural born citizen”ship. And to quote Leo Donofrio:

According to Chief Justice Marshall’s opinion in Marbury v. Madison, the 14th amendment cannot make the natural born citizen clause from Article 2 Section 1 superfluous. If being born as a 14th Amendment citizen was enough to be President, then the natural born citizen clause would have no effect. According to Marshall, that argument is inadmissible.

Natural born citizenship is different from mere citizenship.

Again from Leo Donofrio:

Let’s take a look at Vattel’s famous text:

§ 212. Citizens and natives.

The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.

Two different sentences. Two different civil groups are being discussed.

Examine the subject heading given by Vattel, “Natives and Citizens”. Two separate groups of the civil society are addressed in the heading. And here is the start of the greatest proof that the framers relied on Vattel as to the natural born citizen clause.

God, the Bible, and Our Founders

Note the following time line:
————————————————
1776/07/04 – Declaration of Independence declares as self-evident truth that all men are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights
1777/07/07 – The Congress desire to have a Bible printed under their care & by their encouragement
1777/09/11 – The Congress of the United States of America moved to import 20,000 copies of the Bible
1787/09/17 – Final draft of the Constitution sent to Congress
1787/12/07 – Delaware ratifies the Constitution
1787/12/12 – Pennsylvania ratifies the Constitution
1787/12/18 – New Jersey ratifies the Constitution
1788/01/02 – Georgia ratifies the Constitution
1788/01/09 – Connecticut ratifies the Constitution
1788/02/06 – Massachusetts ratifies the Constitution
1788/04/28 – Maryland ratifies the Constitution
1788/05/23 – South Carolina ratifies the Constitution
1788/06/21 – New Hampshire ratifies the Constitution
1788/06/21 – Constitution Ratified
1788/06/25 – Virginia ratifies the Constitution
1788/07/26 – New York ratifies the Constitution
1789/03/04 – The Constitution goes into effect
1789/04/30 – President George Washington takes office
1789/09/25- Congress passes 12 Amendments (which became Amendments 1-10, 27, and one unratified)
1789/10/03 – At the request of Congress, President George Washington issues Thanksgiving Proclamation
1789/11/20 – New Jersey ratifies Amendments 1-10
1789/11/21 – North Carolina ratifies the Constitution
1789/12/19 – Maryland ratifies Amendments 1-10
1789/12/22 – North Carolina ratifies Amendments 1-10
1790/01/19 – South Carolina ratifies Amendments 1-10
1790/01/25 – New Hampshire ratifies Amendments 1-10
1790/01/28 – Delaware ratifies Amendments 1-10
1790/02/24 – New York ratifies Amendments 1-10
1790/03/10 – Pennsylvania ratifies Amendments 1-10
1790/05/29 – Rhode Island ratifies the Constitution
1790/06/07 – Rhode Island ratifies Amendments 1-10
1791/03/04 – Vermont ratifies the Constitution
1791/11/03 – Vermont ratifies Amendments 1-10
1791/12/15 – Virginia ratifies Amendments 1-10
1791/12/15 – Amendments 1-10 ratified
1795/01/01 – President Washington issues another Thanksgiving Proclamation
————————————————

The Bill of Rights is about preserving our God-given (Endowed by our Creator) inalienable rights.

The First Amendment is about preserving our God-given (Endowed by our Creator) inalienable rights in our expression of religion: in speech, in press, in assembly, in petitioning for redress of grievances.

The First Amendment is about ensuring that the government never takes away our freedom of religious expression.

Yet today, that has been turned 180 degrees, and a phrase that doesn’t even exist in the Constitution or Bill of Rights is now being used to take away the very rights the first amendment was written to protect.

Those who best understand the “original intent” of the first amendment are those who were there when it was written and subsequently ratified in 11 states. If the original intent was as the ACLU claims, then why did President George Washington issue these religious proclamations? Why didn’t anyone object and claim that they were unconstitutional?

Realize this truth: The same congress that passed this amendment on September 25th, 1789…

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

…was the same Congress that asked President George Washington to issue the Thanksgiving Proclamation that was delivered a mere eight days later: October 3rd, 1789.

And whereas both Houses of Congress have, by their joint Committee, requested me

“To recommend to the People of the United States, a Day of public Thanksgiving and Prayer, to be observed by acknowledging with grateful Hearts the many and signal Favors of Almighty GOD, especially by affording them an Opportunity peaceably to establish a Form of Government for their Safety and Happiness.”

Many people, including the atheist Hitchens, are wrong about the Founders.

A Few Declarations of Founding Fathers and Early Statesmen on Jesus, Christianity, and the Bible.

Some, like Dan Riehl, like to make hay about “What Washington didn’t say about God and the Bible“. Let them go back and read the multitude of primary source documents that clearly show how the overwhelming majority of our founders based both their lives and founding of this country upon the Bible.

The First Amendment Turned Upside-Down

IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America…

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men

The purpose of government is to secure, not take away (!), our God-given (Creator-endowed) rights.

And a mere fourteen (14) months after that Declaration was signed, the Congress of the United States of America moved to import 20,000 copies of the Bible.

And ten years after that, when a number of states expressed that the new Constitution did not go far enough to restrict the government and prevent abuses, the response was 10 amendments to further restrict the government and therefore further secure our God-given (Creator-endowed) rights. Those 10 amendments are called the “Bill of Rights” for that reason.

Congress of the United States
begun and held at the City of New-York, on
Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

…

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

The Congress is constitutionally prohibited from making any law respecting an establishment of religion.

Note that establishment of religion is prohibited, but endorsement of religion is not.

The same Congress that passed the first amendment on on September 25th, 1789 was the same Congress that days later asked President George Washington to “recommend to the People of the United States, a Day of public Thanksgiving and Prayer, to be observed by acknowledging with grateful Hearts the many and signal Favors of Almighty GOD”.

The Congress is constitutionally prohibited from making any law that prohibits the free exercise of religion.

Rather than our government securing our God-given right to freedom of religious exercise and expression, our government is actively and unconstitutionally taking away those rights.

These soldiers have every Constitutional right to hand out Bibles. And the military regulation against proselytizing is itself an unconstitutional regulation. The government of the United States of America does not have the right to tell a citizen of the United States, military or civilian, that they cannot hand out Bibles.  Quite to the contrary, in our founders’ day, the government of the United States of America voted to import 20,000 Bibles.

Again, what these soldiers were doing was not unconstitutional. Our Constitution does not prohibit proselytizing. What is unconstitutional was the confiscation and destruction of these Bibles. Our constitution prohibits is government interference in the free exercise of religion. The soldiers rights (to hand out these Bibles) are protected by the first amendment, and those rights have been violated.

As a further illustration that the Bill of Rights was about restricting the government, and not about restricting the people, look at the third and fourth amendments:

Amendment III

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Those amendments were to keep the government out of your house, but NOT to keep you from leaving your house! The “wall of separation” is only a one-way wall… to restrict the government, not the citizen! The government is restricted from coming in, but the citizen is not restricted from going out.

It’s the same way with the first amendment… the government is restricted from interfering with the religious activities of the people, but the people are not restricted in what religious activities they can perform.

The meaning of the First Amendment has been turned upside-down, and now our own government is confiscating and destroying Bibles. Insane.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again…

Those who can’t handle the truth,
try to silence those who speak it.

——————————

See Also:
God, Moses, Crosses and the Bible in Our Capitol Building

Pelosi and Obama – Partners in Crime?

Nancy Pelosi has made a habit of calling other people liars. Her projection has finally turned on her. If she’ll repeatedly lie about what the Bible says, she’ll lie about anything.

We expect honesty, integrity, and transparency from our elected officials, especially from those at the top. Pelosi is third in line to the Presidency, and she played a pivotal role in vouching for Obama’s eligibility.

Obama’s grandmother said she was present at his birth…in Kenya.  The Kenyan government then put a gag order on Obama’s extended family.

The Kenyan ambassador said that it is “well known” to Kenyans that Obama was born there.

The Official Report of the Kenyan National Assembly Wednesday, 5th November, 2008 (since scrubbed from their web site, but archived here) said:

…the President-elect, Mr. Obama, is a son of the soil of this country…

…the people of the United States of America have just had a historic election where the son of this soil, Barrack Hussein Obama, has been elected the 44th President of the United States of America…

 
…we are the home of the President-elect of the USA…

The Statement by Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Hawaii’s Department Of Health Director, never claimed that Obama was born in Hawaii.

The Associated Press spread misinformation, claiming that “State declares Obama birth certificate genuine” and “State officials say there’s no doubt Barack Obama was born in Hawaii”. Both of those statements are lies.  The state of Hawaii never declared Obama’s birth certificate genuine, and state officials never said Obama was born in Hawaii.  To claim “there’s no doubt Barack Obama was born in Hawaii” is maliciously false.

The only document Barack Obama ever produced was a forgery, and the hard copy was only shown to a small, controlled, friendly audience (Annenberg Political Fact Check) who then made their own false claims:

FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate

and

The director of Hawaii’s Department of Health confirmed Oct. 31 that Obama was born in Honolulu.

Both of those statements are NOT TRUE!

When deciding whether or not to put Barack Obama’s name on the ballot, not a single Secretary of State from any of the 50 states asked to see his original birth certificate directly from the state of Hawaii.  All 50 Secretaries of State took Nancy Pelosi’s word that Barack Obama was constitutionally eligible to become President and Commander-in-Chief.

How important is it that Pelosi’s lies be exposed in “Water(boarding)gate”?

Very important.  Because exposing Pelosi as the liar that she is may lead to “due diligence” finally being performed on Barack Obama, and exposing that he is not constitutionally eligible to hold the office of President and Commander-in-Chief.

Nancy Pelosi’s Lies

On multiple occasions, Nancy Pelosi lied about what the Bible says.

If she’ll lie about that, she’ll lie about anything.

Former Speaker Gingrich on Speaker Pelosi:

“She is a trivial politician, viciously using partisanship for the narrowest of purposes, and she dishonors the Congress by her behavior.”

“…she either comes across as incompetent, or dishonest. Those are the only two defenses,” Gingrich said. “The fact is she either didn’t do her job, or she did do her job and she’s now afraid to tell the truth.”

Pelosi claims the CIA mislead/lied to her and Congress.

Pelosi was told the truth by the CIA, says … Obama appointee Leon Panetta

I repeat: If Nancy Pelosi will lie, repeatedly, about what the Bible says, then she will lie about anything.

—

Update: Pelosiku!

My contributions:

“O” eligible?
Natural Born Citizen?
Pelosi said so.

Would Pelosi lie?
Why would she ever do that?
“Son of [Kenyan] soil”.