I have believed since March that this is part of Obama’s plan:
If he “wins” (”by any means necessary“), he wins.
If he loses, he has his underlings incite riots by his supporters (of all races).
Don’t believe it? Look what happened when his relative lost an election…
Odinga was named prime minister in Kenya after his campaign called for protests of an election he lost by more than 200,000 votes to incumbent Mwai Kibaki. The resulting violence by marauding Muslim mobs left 1,000 people dead, hundreds of thousands displaced from their homes and 800 Christian churches damaged or destroyed. No Islamic mosques were damaged, however.
I believe Obama’s goal, like his mentor Bill Ayers’ goal, is Communist Revolution.
What do you think “He’s gonna change it, rearrange it” means?
The Communist Party USA has a Constitution that they want to put in place of our Constitution. Obama misquoted our Constitution and implied that it needs to be replaced in order to form a more perfect union.
He is on video talking about real riots being preceeded by “quiet riot”. He is “inspired” to bring the USA “Empire to its knees”.
If you are already brainwashed for Obama, nothing I show you, no matter how true it is, will persuade you to change your vote.
But those who haven’t been drinking the ObamaNation kool-aid will look at the primary source material, words written and spoken by Obama and Ayers (Barry and Billy), and see them as Communist Revolutionaries.
I believe that we are all one human race, but for those who believe in “races”, Ayers is “white” and Obama is 1/2 “white”, 1/2 “black”.
It’s not about race. It’s about Communist Revolution.
Racism is just a tool Obama is using in an attempt to help bring about revolution.
Barack explains how “[his] journey is part of a larger journey”…one that includes references to Revolutionary War:
Both Barack Obama and Bill Ayers like to talk about ending an Empire:
Just out of pure curiosity, is there any ancestoral linkage between Obama and Nikolai Yezhov?
UPDATE: Ayers is already laying the groundwork to frame an Obama loss as being the result of “White Supremacy“.
Flashback from March: Obama Nation:
Using Racism In Order To Form A More Socialist Union
October 30, 2008 UPDATE :
Erica Jong Tells Italians Obama Loss ‘Will Spark the Second American Civil War. Blood Will Run in the Streets‘
October 24, 2008 at 11:36 am
[...] Who Wants to Incite Riots and Why? [...]
October 24, 2008 at 12:06 pm
I think you have been drinking the McPain Kool-aid… Do you have 100’s of Millions of dollars to protect? Then I could see why you would want McPain in office… Clearly what Reagan started was a bunch of Nonsense… Open your mind. Stop the divided party line politics – they are both against the people… retard.
October 24, 2008 at 1:30 pm
I would absolutely LOVE for someone in the media to ask Obama if he thinks the United States is/was an Imperialist power?
October 24, 2008 at 1:36 pm
You know what I love about Obama?
He is such a uniter…
…uniting Democrats and Republicans against his Communist Revolution.
You want to see examples of Democrats against Obama?
http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/
http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com/
http://justsaynodeal.com/
http://hillbuzz.wordpress.com/ten-reasons-democrats-should-support-john-mccain/
Say it ain’t so, Joe!
October 24, 2008 at 1:39 pm
AngryDumbo,
It would have to be Fox News, because it appears to me that all of the others are part of the Vast Left-Wing [Communist] Conspiracy.
Birds of a feather…flock together.
The interesting thing about your question is that I believe the reason Obama was “not allowed” to go to Alaska and Hawaii is because his handlers believe those states were acquired through Imperialism!
Here’s an interesting find from the “Prairie Fire” web site:
Stolen Islands: Hawai`i Demands Sovereignty
Now, of course, Obama has to travel to Hawaii for legal reasons, but he’d prefer the MSM to say his trip is only about visiting his grandmother. You know, that grandmother that Obama called a “typical white person“, but don’t call him a racist.
October 24, 2008 at 3:40 pm
RP, This post is spot-on. Congratulations! This guy is a menace and must be defeated.
Have you seen the following link:
http://mises.org/books/TRTS/
It’s a illustrated The Road to Serfdom, by FA Hayek. This is a quick way to get the basics to young people who have no idea about totalitarianism.
Did you hear the government is talking about buying equity in insurance companies? Bush is in on this or he’s stupid—effectively his administration has nationalized the mortgage banking industry—and now this. Capitalism is dieing a pretty quick death—all thanks to the federal government.
October 24, 2008 at 4:15 pm
Scott,
Thank you for your kind words. I pray for people to know the truth…knowing the truth will set them free. I also pray in the name of Jesus Christ for all corruption, regardless of party, to be exposed, prosecuted, convicted, and prevented. The future of our Constitutional Republic depends on people knowing the truth and corruption being prevented in our elections.
Thanks for the book link… that is a simple, straightforward explanation of what happens when good men do nothing to stop the advance of evil men. Did I just say “evil”? Yes, just like President Ronald Reagan did.
In regards to President Bush, he makes me sigh and shake my head. He is a good man, with a good heart, buy he apparently has no spirit of discernment. He trusts people who should not be trusted. Maybe the people who called Karl Rove “Bush’s Brain” were right…when Karl left, all hell broke loose. In particular, I am highly suspicious of the circumstances that led to Treasury Secretary Snow being replaced by Paulson. I think Paulson is a trojan horse…a Communist who is helping to manufacture crisis (stage 3 of 4).
Bush is following Paulson’s lead, to the detriment of our country. It breaks my heart that President Bush, a born-again Christian, is naively going along with Paulson’s plans to lead us down The Road to Socialism.
October 24, 2008 at 4:25 pm
[...] (Hat tip to Scott) [...]
October 24, 2008 at 5:04 pm
Can’t remember the exact quote and don’t know where to find it, but two or three days ago on the campaign trail, Obama was saying something to the effect that the prize would have to be fought for. . . victory cannot be achieved without fighting. The way he was phrasing it was eerily similar to “without armed struggle there can be no victory.”
October 24, 2008 at 5:08 pm
And wow, what a resemblance to Nikolai Yezhov! I thought it immediately when I saw the picture and then I read your caption. Looks more like him than daddy BO.
October 24, 2008 at 6:24 pm
sweettakin,
The quote came from his neighbor Bill Ayers’ book The Prarie Fire.
http://www.zombietime.com/prairie_fire/
But the thug messiah is just the terrorists’ neighbor…right
October 24, 2008 at 6:37 pm
If the MSM were honest, it would have been revealed months ago that Obama is Ayers’ protégé.
Ayers is the one who got Obama the only “executive experience” job Obama ever had: Chairman of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge.
Ayers introduced Obama to the important players in his own living room. (Kicking off Obama’s first campaign).
October 24, 2008 at 6:39 pm
RP, It came as no shock to me when I lifted the quote in question and pasted into google that Ayers’ book popped up.
The thug from Chicago is part of a machine that will lead to the dissolution of our Republic.
October 25, 2008 at 12:07 am
[...] Ronald Reagan, March 8, 1983 « Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy Outsources Jobs to Romania Who Wants to Incite Riots and Why? [...]
October 30, 2008 at 12:58 am
Well said.
The strategies of Obama and past socialist revolutionaries are very similar. Hillary tried class envy too, but she didn’t have the charisma of a Lenin or Mao or Hitler.
What propelled Obama past her was drawing upon ‘white guilt’ to beat her, and his charisma.
October 30, 2008 at 9:53 am
Terry_Jim,
Thank you for your comment.
Have you seen the Fascist Dictator Checklist?
Both Obama and Clinton are disciples of Saul Alinksy.
…and that it appears he bused in people from other states into caucuses in order to “win” them “by any means necessary“.
October 30, 2008 at 1:26 pm
This is the reason; a) The Founding Fathers wanted to insure our right to keep and carry arms, and b) why oblabla wants to remove that right, and change our constitution! Though there are only 4 or 5 oblabla signs in my affluent neighborhood, I keep wanting to park my car when I pass one, and knock on their door and ask them, “what the he!! are you thinking?”
October 30, 2008 at 1:27 pm
itooktheredpill, I agree; voter fraud is the only thing that elevate this socialist empty suit to the white house!
October 30, 2008 at 6:38 pm
[...] Who Wants to Incite Riots and Why? [...]